From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Nobis Subject: Re: Include another org-document without settings Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:05:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lhkhzw39.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIB4q-0006WS-1M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:05:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIB4m-0001Jk-1c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:05:43 -0500 Received: from basilikum.nobis-admin.de ([89.238.71.130]:33477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIB4l-0001Id-L9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:05:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by basilikum.nobis-admin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCAB7E0E52 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:05:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from basilikum.nobis-admin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basilikum.nobis-admin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GpF8lMRT4QIC for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from karotte.fritz.box (unknown [IPv6:2001:4dd0:fb8a:0:205e:625f:f74d:3b18]) by basilikum.nobis-admin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:05:32 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87lhkhzw39.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:53:46 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > When I used to do this in LaTeX, I usually had a /master/ document > which included the others. That's what I did with pure LaTeX, too. But then there is the nice feature in AucTeX which allows you to compile the whole document while you are in one of the slaves. I'm just curious if the #+INCLUDE statement is supposed to work with complete org documents full of global options or if it is intended to work only with slave documents (as in the LaTeX case) without any kind of preamble. Maybe it would be a helful extension to give #+INCLUDE an option to just ignore global settings? -- Until the next mail..., Stefan.