From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hymie@lactose.homelinux.net (hymie!) Subject: Re: Other editors supporting Org-Mode Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87oatmbrj5.fsf@student.uibk.ac.at> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbuWw-0005Sg-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:56:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbuWr-0005aj-5u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:56:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbuWr-0005ab-0K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:55:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbuWp-0006U2-C8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:55:55 +0200 Received: from c-68-50-123-74.hsd1.md.comcast.net ([68.50.123.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:55:55 +0200 Received: from hymie by c-68-50-123-74.hsd1.md.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:55:55 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org In our last episode, the evil Dr. Lacto had captured our hero, Manuel Schneckenreither , who said: >Hi fellows, > >I couldn't find anything on the web about it. Therefore, I like to ask >you if anyone knows a program (another editor) which supports Org mode. I would suggest, rather than adapting more editors to support Org, creating a stand-alone program that "compiles" and manages Org functions separate from the act of editing them. The same way that I edit a TeX file, and then run "tex" to process it into a DVI file that I can view; or the same way that I edit an HTML file, and then pull it up in Firefox to view it. I can edit my Org file, then I can run my Org processor and view the file, view my agenda... I realize that there is a lot of functionality that gets lost, but I think that much of what is lost is "shortcuts". I can easily, for example, change the word TODO to DONE in my editor, or add a SCHEDULED line... On the other hand, you already have emacs as the "supported" Org editor, while adding do-it-yourself support for other editors as well. It just seems to me that writing Org For Emacs, Org For Vim, Org For Notepad, Org For Whatever Mac Uses, Org for Vile ... is duplicating too much effort that a single Org For Java might simplify. Anyway, just thinking out loud. --hymie! http://lactose.homelinux.net/~hymie hymie@lactose.homelinux.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------