From: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: relative scheduling
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:22:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <grwstts0cm.fsf@home.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue\, 9 Oct 2007 18\:09\:08 +0200")
Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 14:32, Richard G Riley wrote:
>
>>
>> Should something +3d work when rescheduling a task? It would be nice if
>> it did and be a little more consistent IMO.
>
> Yes, it would be more consistent so I will do this.
>
> However, a different question pops up here. When rescheduling,
> should the +Nd be relative to today, or relative to
> the currently scheduled date?
>
> - A good reason to make it relative to today is that you might not
> always know that the entry is already scheduled. Using today
> as reference would be safe
>
> - A good reason for doing it relative to the scheduled date is
> that you are *re*-scheduling, and then it is a bit more
> logical to think "lets push this two days down"
>
> Votes?
>
> - Carsten
for me, always relative to today.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-04 12:32 relative scheduling Richard G Riley
2007-10-09 16:09 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-09 17:33 ` John Rakestraw
2007-10-09 21:01 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 20:26 ` Rainer Stengele
2007-10-09 20:32 ` John Wiegley
2007-10-09 21:56 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-10 6:29 ` Bastien
2007-10-10 7:07 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-11 23:22 ` Richard G Riley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=grwstts0cm.fsf@home.net \
--to=rileyrgdev@googlemail.com \
--cc=dominik@science.uva.nl \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).