From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eddward DeVilla" Subject: Re: Re: list indentation Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:05:04 -0600 Message-ID: References: <41c818190802091345n5a49e5f2p23f50186144c33f3@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190802091450g6226c7abp86ad56eb09e8f2b1@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190802091709r68e36eeq1e42df06c6d8673c@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190802092047m5bc8cc8axaa3260aeacde2b7f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JO4NH-0002wv-0B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:05:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JO4NF-0002wj-HM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:05:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JO4NF-0002wg-Ej for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:05:05 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JO4NF-0000mZ-5s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:05:05 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so3917199wxc.24 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:05:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41c818190802092047m5bc8cc8axaa3260aeacde2b7f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Feb 9, 2008 10:47 PM, William Henney wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 9:55 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > > In any case, I'm just trying to come up with something that does the > > job but is not an eye sore in the org buffer. I'm looking for > > something that visually looks like a natural footer or terminator in > > plain text. (And a footer ought to be able to be preceeded by a > > header.) I know the significance of the '/' in xml, but visually, it > > doesn't look right to my eyes. Aside from the meaning in xml code, it > > does say end-of-list to me. If anything, it seems to connect the > > preceeding and proceeding text, like this/that. The dashes draw a > > dividing line. > > How about "-." ? Better. Still kind of cryptic, but more subtle. Actually, since that's all that's on the line, it really doesn't matter what it is. Font lock can hide it or gray it out. It could look like a blank line without the ambiguity. Edd