* property constants in elisp formulas
@ 2007-10-18 22:06 Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-18 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: org-mode list
Hi,
Is there a better way to do this?
===== sample file =====
* top
:PROPERTIES:
:d_5: 0
:h_5: 8
:m_5: 16
:d_4: 2
:h_4: 18
:m_4: 58
:d_3: 6
:h_3: 11
:m_3: 33
:d_2: 3
:h_2: 13
:m_2: 36
:d_1: 0
:h_1: 13
:m_1: 59
:d_0: 0
:h_0: 6
:m_0: 23
:d_n: 17
:h_n: 8
:m_n: 59
:END:
*** test
| | day | hour | minute |
|---+-----+------+--------|
| # | 0 | 8 | 16 |
| # | 2 | 18 | 58 |
| # | 6 | 11 | 33 |
| # | 3 | 13 | 36 |
| # | 0 | 13 | 59 |
| # | 0 | 6 | 23 |
| # | 17 | 8 | 59 |
#+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car
'$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car
'$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car
'$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car
'$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car
'$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car
'$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car
'$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car
'$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car
'$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n)
====================
Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with
an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens
such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand,
maybe I can use that to store a list in a property.
Edd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-10-18 22:06 property constants in elisp formulas Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation. Will be fixed in 5.14. - Carsten On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a better way to do this? > > ===== sample file ===== > * top > :PROPERTIES: > :d_5: 0 > :h_5: 8 > :m_5: 16 > :d_4: 2 > :h_4: 18 > :m_4: 58 > :d_3: 6 > :h_3: 11 > :m_3: 33 > :d_2: 3 > :h_2: 13 > :m_2: 36 > :d_1: 0 > :h_1: 13 > :m_1: 59 > :d_0: 0 > :h_0: 6 > :m_0: 23 > :d_n: 17 > :h_n: 8 > :m_n: 59 > :END: > > *** test > | | day | hour | minute | > |---+-----+------+--------| > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car > '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car > '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car > '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car > '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car > '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car > '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car > '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car > '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car > '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n) > > ==================== > > Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with > an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens > such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand, > maybe I can use that to store a list in a property. > > Edd > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-19 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a property, can I use it in a formula? ===== sample ======== * top :PROPERTIES: :fives: (0 8 16) :fours: (2 18 58) :threes: (6 11 33) :twos: (3 13 36) :ones: (0 13 59) :zeros: (0 6 23) :null: (17 8 59) :END: *** test 1 | | day | hour | minute | |---+-----+------+--------| | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr '$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr '$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr '$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr '$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null) ========================== Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me. In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the alignment code does like underscores in names ===== sample ====== * top :PROPERTIES: :fives: 0 8 16 :d_5: 0 :fours: 2 18 58 :END: ================= Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. ====== sample ======= * top :PROPERTIES: :fives: 0 8 16 :fours: 2 18 58 :threes: 6 11 33 :twos: 3 13 36 :ones: 0 13 59 :zeros: 0 6 23 :null: 17 8 59 :END: *** test 2 | | day | | |---+-----+----| | # | 0 | 0 | | # | 2 | 2 | | # | 6 | 8 | | # | 3 | 11 | | # | 0 | 11 | | # | 0 | 11 | | # | 17 | 28 | #+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null) ==================== Edd On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote: > You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation. > Will be fixed in 5.14. > > - Carsten > > On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a better way to do this? > > > > ===== sample file ===== > > * top > > :PROPERTIES: > > :d_5: 0 > > :h_5: 8 > > :m_5: 16 > > :d_4: 2 > > :h_4: 18 > > :m_4: 58 > > :d_3: 6 > > :h_3: 11 > > :m_3: 33 > > :d_2: 3 > > :h_2: 13 > > :m_2: 36 > > :d_1: 0 > > :h_1: 13 > > :m_1: 59 > > :d_0: 0 > > :h_0: 6 > > :m_0: 23 > > :d_n: 17 > > :h_n: 8 > > :m_n: 59 > > :END: > > > > *** test > > | | day | hour | minute | > > |---+-----+------+--------| > > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | > > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | > > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | > > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | > > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | > > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | > > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | > > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car > > '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car > > '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car > > '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car > > '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car > > '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car > > '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car > > '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car > > '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car > > '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n) > > > > ==================== > > > > Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant with > > an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens > > such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other hand, > > maybe I can use that to store a list in a property. > > > > Edd > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > > > > > -- > Carsten Dominik > Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" > Universiteit van Amsterdam > Kruislaan 403 > NL-1098SJ Amsterdam > phone: +31 20 525 7477 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-23 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list I believe you can, yes. Why don;y you just try and watch the effect by turning on formula debugging? BTW, 5.13d omits the parenthesis in Lisp formula interpolation... - Carsten On Oct 19, 2007, at 10:32 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a > property, can I use it in a formula? > > ===== sample ======== > * top > :PROPERTIES: > :fives: (0 8 16) > :fours: (2 18 58) > :threes: (6 11 33) > :twos: (3 13 36) > :ones: (0 13 59) > :zeros: (0 6 23) > :null: (17 8 59) > :END: > > *** test 1 > | | day | hour | minute | > |---+-----+------+--------| > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr > '$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car > '$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr > '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr > '$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car > '$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr > '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr > '$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car > '$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr > '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr > '$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null) > > ========================== > > Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me. > In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the > alignment code does like underscores in names > > ===== sample ====== > * top > :PROPERTIES: > :fives: 0 8 16 > :d_5: 0 > :fours: 2 18 58 > :END: > > ================= > > Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that > I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c > '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. > > ====== sample ======= > * top > :PROPERTIES: > :fives: 0 8 16 > :fours: 2 18 58 > :threes: 6 11 33 > :twos: 3 13 36 > :ones: 0 13 59 > :zeros: 0 6 23 > :null: 17 8 59 > :END: > > *** test 2 > | | day | | > |---+-----+----| > | # | 0 | 0 | > | # | 2 | 2 | > | # | 6 | 8 | > | # | 3 | 11 | > | # | 0 | 11 | > | # | 0 | 11 | > | # | 17 | 28 | > #+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car > '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car > '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car > '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null) > > ==================== > > Edd > > On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote: >> You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation. >> Will be fixed in 5.14. >> >> - Carsten >> >> On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a better way to do this? >>> >>> ===== sample file ===== >>> * top >>> :PROPERTIES: >>> :d_5: 0 >>> :h_5: 8 >>> :m_5: 16 >>> :d_4: 2 >>> :h_4: 18 >>> :m_4: 58 >>> :d_3: 6 >>> :h_3: 11 >>> :m_3: 33 >>> :d_2: 3 >>> :h_2: 13 >>> :m_2: 36 >>> :d_1: 0 >>> :h_1: 13 >>> :m_1: 59 >>> :d_0: 0 >>> :h_0: 6 >>> :m_0: 23 >>> :d_n: 17 >>> :h_n: 8 >>> :m_n: 59 >>> :END: >>> >>> *** test >>> | | day | hour | minute | >>> |---+-----+------+--------| >>> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | >>> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | >>> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | >>> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | >>> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | >>> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | >>> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | >>> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car >>> '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car >>> '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car >>> '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car >>> '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car >>> '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car >>> '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car >>> '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car >>> '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car >>> '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n) >>> >>> ==================== >>> >>> Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant >>> with >>> an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens >>> such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other >>> hand, >>> maybe I can use that to store a list in a property. >>> >>> Edd >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Carsten Dominik >> Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" >> Universiteit van Amsterdam >> Kruislaan 403 >> NL-1098SJ Amsterdam >> phone: +31 20 525 7477 >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-10-23 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list On 10/23/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe you can, yes. Why don;y you just try and watch the effect > by turning on formula debugging? It works now. I just wasn't sure if it was supposed to. cool. > BTW, 5.13d omits the parenthesis in Lisp formula interpolation... Great! Thanks. Did you notice the other two problems in my email? I wasn't sure if they got lost after the long example. The underscore in properties isn't that big of a deal, but the problem with the formula editor is really annoying. Edd > - Carsten > > On Oct 19, 2007, at 10:32 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > > > Now, just as a stupid question, if I put a lisp expression into a > > property, can I use it in a formula? > > > > ===== sample ======== > > * top > > :PROPERTIES: > > :fives: (0 8 16) > > :fours: (2 18 58) > > :threes: (6 11 33) > > :twos: (3 13 36) > > :ones: (0 13 59) > > :zeros: (0 6 23) > > :null: (17 8 59) > > :END: > > > > *** test 1 > > | | day | hour | minute | > > |---+-----+------+--------| > > | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | > > | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | > > | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | > > | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | > > | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | > > | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | > > | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | > > #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_fives)::@2$3='(cadr > > '$PROP_fives)::@2$4='(caddr '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car > > '$PROP_fours)::@3$3='(cadr '$PROP_fours)::@3$4='(caddr > > '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car '$PROP_threes)::@4$3='(cadr > > '$PROP_threes)::@4$4='(caddr '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car > > '$PROP_twos)::@5$3='(cadr '$PROP_twos)::@5$4='(caddr > > '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car '$PROP_ones)::@6$3='(cadr > > '$PROP_ones)::@6$4='(caddr '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car > > '$PROP_zeros)::@7$3='(cadr '$PROP_zeros)::@7$4='(caddr > > '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null)::@8$3='(cadr > > '$PROP_null)::@8$4='(caddr '$PROP_null) > > > > ========================== > > > > Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me. > > In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the > > alignment code does like underscores in names > > > > ===== sample ====== > > * top > > :PROPERTIES: > > :fives: 0 8 16 > > :d_5: 0 > > :fours: 2 18 58 > > :END: > > > > ================= > > > > Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that > > I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with C-c > > '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. > > > > ====== sample ======= > > * top > > :PROPERTIES: > > :fives: 0 8 16 > > :fours: 2 18 58 > > :threes: 6 11 33 > > :twos: 3 13 36 > > :ones: 0 13 59 > > :zeros: 0 6 23 > > :null: 17 8 59 > > :END: > > > > *** test 2 > > | | day | | > > |---+-----+----| > > | # | 0 | 0 | > > | # | 2 | 2 | > > | # | 6 | 8 | > > | # | 3 | 11 | > > | # | 0 | 11 | > > | # | 0 | 11 | > > | # | 17 | 28 | > > #+TBLFM: $3='(apply '+ '(@-I$2..$2));N::@2$2='(car > > '$PROP_fives)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_fours)::@4$2='(car > > '$PROP_threes)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_twos)::@6$2='(car > > '$PROP_ones)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_zeros)::@8$2='(car '$PROP_null) > > > > ==================== > > > > Edd > > > > On 10/19/07, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote: > >> You are right, there should be no parenthesis in Lisp interpolation. > >> Will be fixed in 5.14. > >> > >> - Carsten > >> > >> On Oct 19, 2007, at 0:06, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Is there a better way to do this? > >>> > >>> ===== sample file ===== > >>> * top > >>> :PROPERTIES: > >>> :d_5: 0 > >>> :h_5: 8 > >>> :m_5: 16 > >>> :d_4: 2 > >>> :h_4: 18 > >>> :m_4: 58 > >>> :d_3: 6 > >>> :h_3: 11 > >>> :m_3: 33 > >>> :d_2: 3 > >>> :h_2: 13 > >>> :m_2: 36 > >>> :d_1: 0 > >>> :h_1: 13 > >>> :m_1: 59 > >>> :d_0: 0 > >>> :h_0: 6 > >>> :m_0: 23 > >>> :d_n: 17 > >>> :h_n: 8 > >>> :m_n: 59 > >>> :END: > >>> > >>> *** test > >>> | | day | hour | minute | > >>> |---+-----+------+--------| > >>> | # | 0 | 8 | 16 | > >>> | # | 2 | 18 | 58 | > >>> | # | 6 | 11 | 33 | > >>> | # | 3 | 13 | 36 | > >>> | # | 0 | 13 | 59 | > >>> | # | 0 | 6 | 23 | > >>> | # | 17 | 8 | 59 | > >>> #+TBLFM: @2$2='(car '$PROP_d_5)::@2$3='(car '$PROP_h_5)::@2$4='(car > >>> '$PROP_m_5)::@3$2='(car '$PROP_d_4)::@3$3='(car > >>> '$PROP_h_4)::@3$4='(car '$PROP_m_4)::@4$2='(car > >>> '$PROP_d_3)::@4$3='(car '$PROP_h_3)::@4$4='(car > >>> '$PROP_m_3)::@5$2='(car '$PROP_d_2)::@5$3='(car > >>> '$PROP_h_2)::@5$4='(car '$PROP_m_2)::@6$2='(car > >>> '$PROP_d_1)::@6$3='(car '$PROP_h_1)::@6$4='(car > >>> '$PROP_m_1)::@7$2='(car '$PROP_d_0)::@7$3='(car > >>> '$PROP_h_0)::@7$4='(car '$PROP_m_0)::@8$2='(car > >>> '$PROP_d_n)::@8$3='(car '$PROP_h_n)::@8$4='(car '$PROP_m_n) > >>> > >>> ==================== > >>> > >>> Specifically, is there a better way to get at a property constant > >>> with > >>> an elisp formula? It seems the value is automatically put in parens > >>> such that $h_3 is (11) which is a little awkward. On the other > >>> hand, > >>> maybe I can use that to store a list in a property. > >>> > >>> Edd > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list > >>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Carsten Dominik > >> Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" > >> Universiteit van Amsterdam > >> Kruislaan 403 > >> NL-1098SJ Amsterdam > >> phone: +31 20 525 7477 > >> > >> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-01 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eddward DeVilla; +Cc: org-mode list On 23Oct2007, at 5:06 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: >>> ========================== >>> >>> Also, in the above example, the property values were aligned for me. >>> In my previous example, that didn't happen. It seems that the >>> alignment code does like underscores in names >>> >>> ===== sample ====== >>> * top >>> :PROPERTIES: >>> :fives: 0 8 16 >>> :d_5: 0 >>> :fours: 2 18 58 >>> :END: Fixed, thanks. >>> >>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that >>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with >>> C-c >>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B& The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like (car '2 18 58) which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in parenthesis, or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will lead to (car '(2 18 58)) - Carsten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-03 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list On 11/1/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that > >>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with > >>> C-c > >>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. > > This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B& > > The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like > > (car '2 18 58) > > which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in > parenthesis, > or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will > lead to > > (car '(2 18 58)) Actually, that wasn't what I was seeing. In the table formula editor it highlight the region represented by @-I$2..B& as though it were @-I$2..$3. I'll have to see if I can put together a better recreate. I have this happen on my machine at work, but it's not happening not at home. Sorry. Edd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: property constants in elisp formulas 2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Eddward DeVilla @ 2007-11-05 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode list On 11/2/07, Eddward DeVilla <eddward@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/1/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Lastly, since I'm whining, there's a bug in the formula editor that > > >>> I'm not sure if I've mentioned before. Edit the table below with > > >>> C-c > > >>> '. The '(@-I$2..$2) will become '(@-I$2..B&) which causes #ERRORs. > > > > This is the same, @-I$2..$2 is the same as @-I$2..B& > > > > The errors are caused by interpolations: you get something like > > > > (car '2 18 58) > > > > which is obvioulsly a bug. You need to enclose the properties in > > parenthesis, > > or supply the parenthesis in the formula, so that interpolation will > > lead to > > > > (car '(2 18 58)) > > Actually, that wasn't what I was seeing. In the table formula editor > it highlight the region represented by @-I$2..B& as though it were > @-I$2..$3. I'll have to see if I can put together a better recreate. > I have this happen on my machine at work, but it's not happening not > at home. Sorry. OK. My fault. I had an old version of org at work. This has already been fixed. Edd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-05 18:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-10-18 22:06 property constants in elisp formulas Eddward DeVilla 2007-10-19 16:11 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-19 20:32 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-10-23 5:10 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-23 15:06 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-11-01 8:36 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-11-03 0:37 ` Eddward DeVilla 2007-11-05 18:20 ` Eddward DeVilla
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).