From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
Subject: Re: Begginer using orgmode
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104252142230.25804@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
References: <0F2397E5-B7B1-4BFB-A0D5-FBA091BB32EA@radford.edu>
	<BANLkTiki-Uu95VQUW9ix+UNadyq=o7SY-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<DD0FCD18-A092-4C96-A314-B03E9E051EF3@RADFORD.EDU>
	<20110416013231.13e3a0ef@bhishma.homelinux.net>
	<loom.20110425T232348-605@post.gmane.org>
	<BA94EA78-9555-4399-9D27-13D47FF7347D@om.org>
	<98E677DA-C9CB-4AED-9A86-5EE98C62721A@RADFORD.EDU>
	<BANLkTik_8ayqEi=jpUM5yMisaAqMzPdSxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1104252003420.22086@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
	<BANLkTinjq+Y5L3WLYYoC_U1GMHA67uNptw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60694)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jdashiel@shellworld.net>) id 1QEXJL-0000MS-FM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:43:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jdashiel@shellworld.net>) id 1QEXJK-0007t1-5H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:43:31 -0400
Received: from shellworld.net ([69.60.117.94]:57094
	helo=server1.shellworld.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jdashiel@shellworld.net>) id 1QEXJK-0007sv-1G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:43:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinjq+Y5L3WLYYoC_U1GMHA67uNptw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Cc: "Arnold, Travis" <tlarnold@radford.edu>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, "Urs Rau (UK)" <urs.rau@om.org>

Dead simple so long as build goes nominally.  That didn't happen with 
current stable version on my mac, so you recommend the git clone?

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, John Hendy wrote:

> I'd just recommend installing whatever version of emacs you want and
> then install org from git. Dead simple, no confusion about being up to
> date, etc.
> 
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#keeping-current-with-Org-mode-development
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> John
> 
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net> wrote:
> > I had aquaemacs on my mac earlier.  It didn't come with org-mode built
> > in.  I think maybe org-mode 4.54 is included in emacsformacosx if ifo
> > org in terminal mode on my mac mini is any indicator.  I hope this helps
> > somebody.
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, John Hendy wrote:
> >
> >> Google it. Sifting through, however...
> >>
> >> - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1096009/carbon-vs-aqua-vs-cocoa-emacs-builds
> >> - http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsForMacOS
> >>
> >> I chose gnu emacs. No particular reason, but there was something
> >> psychological about using the same on Linux as well, so I went with
> >> it. I asked this question before and don't think I heard much say one
> >> way or the other.
> >>
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Arnold, Travis <tlarnold@radford.edu> wrote:
> >> > Is there a difference between the two?
> >> > Or personal prefrence?
> >> > -Travis
> >> > On 25 Apr, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Urs Rau (UK) wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://aquamacs.org/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
>