Re: Q: Attachments and IDs?

[David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com>]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> I do not think that we need an appendix - most of the terms are simply
> introduced one by one while reading the manual.

My problem may be in treating the user's manual as a reference manual.
So, if a term is introduced (and explained) in another section(s) that I
didn't think applied to my particular issue, I might not see it or even
know where to look for it without reading the whole manual.  Coupled
with fading memory, I forget what I read a few months ago that might
apply.  The appendix idea was simply to get all the key terminology in
one area (which could then reference out to other sections in the
manual) like Main Index.  Wait a sec -- Main Index?  I hadn't really
thought about that before, but I think that's what I meant by appendix.

Duh.  Thanks for putting *up* with me.

-- 
David Masterson