From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: LaTeX export > Avoid \newline command after timestampsX-Draft-From: ("nnimap+mc:INBOX.sncb") Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:47:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ocin3yq6.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fx3yg1mm.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ns9j8-0008Mv-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:01:06 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54190 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ns9j5-0008M0-RA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:01:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns9j2-0002hK-Qh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:01:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227]:62046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns9ix-0002Yu-Ap for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:00:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ew0-f227.google.com with SMTP id 27so1039911ewy.14 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fx3yg1mm.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Maus Cc: mailing-list-org-mode On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:00 PM, David Maus wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> Hi Francesco, > >> thanks for this. The reason why I put this is is to make sure that >> text after that line will start >> in a new line, and now flow into the scheduled/deadline line. For >> example: > >> *** DONE My Task :Be: >> SCHEDULED: <2010-03-01 Mon> DEADLINE: <2010-03-05 Fri> >> this should start a new line but does not with your patch > >> Do you disagree that this is the right thing to do? Do you know a >> method to achieve the same result without generating extra white >> space? > > We could simply insert a blank line (e.g. "\n\n"), couldn't we? This > would let LaTeX start a new paragraph if there's no space between > scheduled/deadline line and do no harm if there is, because LaTeX > doesn't care about multiple newlines. Yes, we could, but what I tries was to *not* start a new paragraph... - Carsten > > HTH > -- David > > -- > OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 > Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org > Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de - Carsten