From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Kielhorn Subject: Re: Unicode (double-byte?) goofs up text table layout Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:26:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87a97oyxv0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG3xF-0007aX-Uu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:32:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG3xA-0007LK-TQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:32:53 -0400 Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5300::12]:17969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG3x9-0007Kn-6i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:32:47 -0400 Received: from regis.fritz.box (p5790DCE6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.144.220.230]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id K06cd7q79AQKTrx (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:26:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87a97oyxv0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-Mode Mailing List Am 01.08.2014 um 18:32 schrieb Eric Abrahamsen : > John Lusk writes: > >> Hey, org-mode crew. Awesome app; I love it. It's pretty much the >> only thing that keeps me in emacs these days (apart from writing >> Python code :) ). >> > > A bit of work has gone into keeping double-byte characters from messing > up Org tables, but my guess is what you've got there is just an odd-out > glyph. It looks like the, erm, carrots (I'm not a mathematician) are > getting borrowed from a different font and substituted into your > fixed-width font where they don't quite belong. > > [five minutes later] > > I just went and did my homework and LOGICAL OR and LOGICAL AND are > in fact single-byte characters. If they look funny, it's just because > few fixed-width fonts come with all the necessaries. I don't think > there's much way around that... Both characters are in DejaVu Sans Mono Free Monospaced Menlo Try one of these fonts. Axel