From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aCwgHjaeYl+nDAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:22:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id SLLrGTaeYl+YQAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:22:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083489403C6 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIgkr-0007Fn-N1 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:22:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIgkH-0007Ff-Gx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:21:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:51193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIgkE-00069f-9H; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:21:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id e17so186290wme.0; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:21:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b4p8rjUuVVEvpoOMpW/WIaIYbZZrjBIIepzG+6QwVLU=; b=ukXGxo1gFBsZZeJURQghyZEMieGEWYmTS2SUUjRTCaCAgHEXjbZQLNU1PLMlEPEWdP fe5yEQKt3oKgKU3z1lPXgNh8XH5CxNi6MH5wIWLd4bo9/N3CoQNa6+E7ziw3fMzvj4dV XjNUxxwwf1wTx9hPLzdNT6F5EsBzH3fM0CTsZIVRu0hMb3uf+Jd/8EFbIx0GCW0FSyTz 0K/b/ZedYzcmuQJozD6FjRUBjpN97uvruLzROOpiQUohzmDwcVmUJNEm/PLt6eV3p99b vnSzOsKpMnuGHNnid8Zky39TEjUBmktOThexZ3unNx28YjL7i+uY85i6wdTHka9IEuYQ nodg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322CmSxY613mxDPQluCXjlWb4PnMRMioWKSXpcMuiF0X/OcNy27 dWa8yjy/2c3/skOUC9dldDp3a4SeVXkVmeL3Fo8w6Fy8JZE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpgg3vhwHPMEMFp1bPHWzDB2l5DB0kbOohFI/9Zyx3oq1w5DkPMX2W5DCQIHysSNCwT6SoGcYQqAN6qd4YjSA= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5602:: with SMTP id k2mr6344815wmb.25.1600298503401; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:21:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <875z8gr09y.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgbkh5cn.fsf@gmail.com> <87een2jir8.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87een2jir8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Adam Spiers Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:21:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help administer code.orgmode.org: moderate user access and manage the gogs instance To: Bastien Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.41; envelope-from=adam.spiers@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-f41.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/16 19:21:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: org-mode mailing list , TEC Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=adamspiers.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.91 X-TUID: wkxhv2wJlfku On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 08:21, Bastien wrote: > Hi Timothy, > > TEC writes: > > >> Is anyone willing to help with (1) and/or (2)? > > > > I'm willing to give (2), and potentially (1) a shot :) > > Thanks a lot! I wrote you offlist about this. It's not nearly as generous an offer, but as I don't have a gogs account yet, I volunteer to be a guinea pig if TEC wants to practice giving (1) a shot ;-) I think I used to have push access to Worg many years ago, and I've noticed one or two issues which I'd be happy to fix if I regained that. Or is Worg also subject to a peer review process these days? Cheers, Adam