Re: org-ref in action

[Xebar Saram <zeltakc@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1802 bytes --]

Hi all

off topic a bit again. im an academic (asst. prof) in Epidemiology and have
been using org-mode for about a year now. i love using org but im really
not very technical at all. it has always been a dream for me to ditch word
and move over to Latex and even better orgmode to write my scientific
publications, writing my CV etc.
The problem is i cant really find a good "for dummies" guide on how to
really get started. again im really not technical so i always give up
really fast on this.

Do you guys think i should give it a shot (again not very technical :)) and
if so what would be the steps/guides to follow? perhaps start by drafting a
CV since thats perhaps easier?

kind regards

Z.






On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:

> Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:
>
> > On 2014-06-26 16:39, Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> writes:
> >
> >> By contrast, ox-bibtex.el runs citations through bibtex2html, which is
> >> pretty much limited to the "old-fashioned" bibtex formats.
> >
> > What would be required for bibtex2html to take biblatex input? I thought
> > the backend format was similar or the same (as you can tell, I know
> > nothing of biblatex).
>
> I don't think this is possible without some major
> hacking/conversion/filtering. Biblatex has many more entry types and
> fields than bibtex. I've found that most of the older bibtex utils
> (bibtools, bibtex2html) choke on my biblatex files.
>
> Even if biblatex2html did read biblatex data, its output, I believe, is
> limited to bibtex styles, which cannot handle more complex formats. Many
> scientific journals require bibtex formats. But many humanities
> disciplines have more complicated bibliographical requirements that
> bibtex cannot handle.
>
> Best,
> Matt
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2768 bytes --]