On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with
>> > complex setups who don't want to change?
>>
>> Yes.  We need to be more careful on being backward compatible.
>>
>> The new patch in that other thread does this.
>
>
>> >     - make src-clojure in <pre class="src src-clojure"> customizable
>> >     ?
>> >
>> > Is this likely to break anything in derived exporters? It would
>> > certianly be convenient e.g for using highlight.js in wordpress in
>> > similar environments.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
>
>> > This seems like a good idea and pretty easy.
>>
>> I will think more about this.
>>
>> > I odn't really quite understand the problem and solution parameters.
>> > Since Yehonathan is here on this thread and enthusiastic about
>> > helping out: is there something he could do to make this feasible for
>> > us?  Or by "more general mechanism" do you mean some third way
>> > between bundling and linking to?
>>
>> One way to solve this on Yehonathan's side is to update klipse.js and
>> follow the instruction on librejs on how to make librejs accept the js
>> code as "safe":
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html
>>
>> I don't know how much work is involved in this, though.
>>
>
> I think you just have to add two lines to non-minified scripts, and one
> more to minified scripts:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.
> html#magnet-link-license
>
> Yehonathan, would you bewilling to do this?
>
​Sure. Will do it tomorrow.​


>
>
>
>> --
>>  Bastien
>>
>
>