From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lookup functions for tables
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:43:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zoi_FRpiXKurjVFRAGo4bMbJhFqsE3cK3dfT-u5wNR1ZmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87392e557q.fsf@syk.fi>
	<CALn3zohx5Kkc_xn1kwx+E=x9YiwC0PRbkTqgr+9xYcLsQeiCoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87392cexqk.fsf@syk.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51855)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1TEwy7-0002U5-CK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:44:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1TEwy1-0004s7-Ey
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:44:07 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:35501)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1TEwy1-0004s3-6s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:44:01 -0400
Received: by lbbgj10 with SMTP id gj10so3437995lbb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87392cexqk.fsf@syk.fi>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@syk.fi>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Jarmo

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@syk.fi> wrote:
> Ok. I guess this also means changing the (next,prev,up) parts of
> @node-commands.

Yes.

> Do you want me to make the change and submit a new patch?

Yes please, I suggest to wait a bit if there will be more comments.

Michael