From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takaaki Ishikawa Subject: Re: function for inserting a block Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 03:51:28 +0900 Message-ID: References: <877exghblx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2uoc4q7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bmllk5xy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tgmwwsa.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po9q2e8k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvyyvpst.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuaiz069.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgk9eo4d.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuahxxvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2u1cuwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87infdctzq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zsbizs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zp4rxj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871slx4j6p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87376btslq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vaj7oyxb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871sl9ow44.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu9pgfkj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87375ouanr.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCVRk-00050U-8u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:51:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCVRj-0004iY-7k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:51:32 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::234]:47712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCVRj-0004hz-29 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:51:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e46so2639364uaa.4 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:51:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , "Berry, Charles" , Rasmus I also support the idea of keeping ": > > Berry, Charles writes: > >>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Rasmus wrote: >>> >>> I think the template expansion a la ">> YASnippet installed for many years, and I never figured out how to use it >>> properly. To me, it is a bit too complex a replacement. >> >> >> Me too. "> >> I suspect that there will be cries of pain and anger from others who have not tuned in to this thread if it is removed. >> >> Chuck > > Agreed. It would be great if backward compatibility could be > maintained. I use (org-try-structure-completion) all the time. > > All the best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com >