From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Allen Li Subject: Re: Bug: shiftmeta[left|right] on multi line items [9.1.2 (release_9.1.2-40-g6ca906 @ /usr/local/share/emacs/27.0.50/lisp/org/)] Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 17:04:20 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87a7zezz4e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2seuzm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1xvwh1m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNq2Y-0006nB-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:04:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNq2X-0006bA-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:04:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]:43902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNq2X-0006aW-OS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:04:21 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w10so31112391qtb.10 for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:04:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k1xvwh1m.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nathan Aclander Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Nathan Aclander wrote: > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> I don't qualify this as a bug. These commands explicitly work when point >> is at the beginning of an item. Indeed, the sub-item may be arbitrarily >> large, contain tables... it would be confusing to move the whole >> sub-list when its structure is out of sight. > > Why do you think it would be confusing to move the whole sub-list? Why > would it be move confusing when the point is on the sub-item vs. when > the point is on the parent item? > > I think the inconsistency is unintuitive here, and causes confusion. And > I think since large sub-items already get moved when the point is > at the beginning, it would make sense to also move them when the point > is on the sub item. > > Nathan I think what Nicolas is saying is this (^ is point): * ^Heading M-S-left/right works here. * Heading ^content text M-S-left/right does not work here. Let=E2=80=99s assume that it does work here to be consistent with the feature/bug you are requesting. * Heading - foo - bar ^second bar line M-S-left/right does not work here. Let=E2=80=99s assume that it does work here per the feature/bug you are requesting. Does it move bar, foo, or Heading? What if the text is very long and you cannot see where you are? ... some very long text ^some very long text some very long text ... What M-S-left/right does would be very confusing.