Re: org-insert-link completion by description (Re: what is the purpose of "This link has already been stored"?)

[Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>]

On 7/3/23, Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/07/2023 07:28, Samuel Wales wrote:
>> again i normally work with 1 window so i can have enough text.
>> sometimes i have a minuibffer.  the end.
>
> ---- 8< ----
> File Edit Options Buffers Tools Minibuf Help
>
> * title
> :PROPERTIES:
> :ID:       e69336ca-ca50-4535-9bad-63a31e030f31
> -UU-:----F1  test.org        2% L2     (Org) -----------------------

for my purposes this window should remain, and be larger.

> Insert a link.
> Use TAB to complete link prefixes, then RET for type-specific compl$
>
> -UUU:**--F1  *Org Links*    Top L1     (Fundamental)

this buffer contains nothing useful and shortens the above buffer.

---------------
> http:                      https:
> id:                        id:e69336ca-ca50-4535-9bad-63a31e030f31
> info:                      irc:
> mailto:                    mhe:
> news:                      rmail:
> shell:                     title
> w3m:

these prefixes like http: i do not understand thier use.  i want
descriptions of headings.  the id link is not one.

>
>
>
>
> -UUU:%*--F1  *Completions*   Bot L10    (Completion List)

i do not see the need for a buffer here.  it reduces the size of hte
buffer that matters.

---------
> Link:
> ---- >8 ----
>
> Notice that "title" is present among the completion options.

title does not show in my case and nots ure the signiricance.  i use
large fonts.  that might or might nto be relevant.

> You may be
> upset, but org-insert-link works correctly. I have no idea why you

emotions are not germane and can carry unintended implications in a
laudably usually polite ml.  i am not upset.

i cannot do this kind of back and forth.  i am limited in computer use.

you used the word correct.  i would say that it is not correct for me.
i believe you if you say it is correct for you.

> customization throws away this completion variant.

you asked me to do -q.  i did -q.  are you saying i am customizeing
-q?  i am unaware of it if so.

everythign here has nothign t9o do with my .emacs.

>
>
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com