From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:02:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8uVVOi5OmUYmKZADdSHpgT33EKOnuOBbdZ1uCqL8Pz=kA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJcAo8vMeGiG773mOU8WSZm=8bYy7TAHiyJtvK2peQ6J_0dtyw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46087)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1j4VXt-0007QG-MJ
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:02:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1j4VXs-0008Pz-IH
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:02:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8vMeGiG773mOU8WSZm=8bYy7TAHiyJtvK2peQ6J_0dtyw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

just an idea but changing the subscript and superscript export feature
to =E2=80=98{}=E2=80=99 would reduce accidental invocation.  i have seen so=
lecistic
subscripts on websites created with org (probably by experts who
babelize their .emacs!), and on this ml :).

i have seen it used accidentally more than i have seen it used for its
intended purpose.  {} seems more unambiguous.

that would, of course, be an issue for those who already have a lot of
the short form in their technical and scientific papers.

so there would have to be a nice regexp fixer.  or a warning.

--=20
The Kafka Pandemic

What is misopathy?
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged=
.html