Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

Testing it just now, it appears that it doesn't - the clock table excludes
times after midnight but before org-extend-today-until. I'll probably work
on fixing this unless someone believes that the current version of org-mode
is expected to respect org-extend-today-until. org-version gives:
Org mode version 9.1.9 (9.1.9-8-gf05c2e-elpaplus)

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> Testing it just now, it appears that it doesn't - the clock table excludes
> times after midnight but before org-extend-today-until. I'll probably work
> on fixing this unless someone believes that the current version of org-mode
> is expected to respect org-extend-today-until. org-version gives:
> Org mode version 9.1.9 (9.1.9-8-gf05c2e-elpaplus)

As its docstring states:

    IMPORTANT:  This is a feature whose implementation is and likely will
    remain incomplete.

IOW, nothing in Org is really expected to respect
`org-extend-today-until'. Patches welcome, of course.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

I have a patch to fix this in https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode
(branch org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). I've submitted a
copyright assignment with the FSF.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:54 AM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,

> Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> > Testing it just now, it appears that it doesn't - the clock table
excludes
> > times after midnight but before org-extend-today-until. I'll probably
work
> > on fixing this unless someone believes that the current version of
org-mode
> > is expected to respect org-extend-today-until. org-version gives:
> > Org mode version 9.1.9 (9.1.9-8-gf05c2e-elpaplus)

> As its docstring states:

>       IMPORTANT:  This is a feature whose implementation is and likely will
>       remain incomplete.

> IOW, nothing in Org is really expected to respect
> `org-extend-today-until'. Patches welcome, of course.

> Regards,

> --
> Nicolas Goaziou



--
Robert Irelan
rirelan@gmail.com

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Bastien]

Hi Robert,

Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> I have a patch to fix this in https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode
> (branch org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). I've submitted a
> copyright assignment with the FSF.

I confirm your copyright assignment is okay.

Can you send a patch against Org's current master branch?

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

I've updated my repo at https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode (branch
org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). (I know I cloned it from an older
org-mode repo on Github, but I've updated it so that my branch is rebased
onto
the current master.) I hope that'll work.
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:11 AM Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Robert,

> Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> > I have a patch to fix this in https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode
> > (branch org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). I've submitted a
> > copyright assignment with the FSF.

> I confirm your copyright assignment is okay.

> Can you send a patch against Org's current master branch?

> Thanks!

> --
>   Bastien



-- 
Robert Irelan
rirelan@gmail.com

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

Hi, is there anything else I should do on this patch?
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:40 PM Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've updated my repo at https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode (branch
> org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). (I know I cloned it from an
older
> org-mode repo on Github, but I've updated it so that my branch is rebased
> onto
> the current master.) I hope that'll work.
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:11 AM Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> > Hi Robert,

> > Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> > > I have a patch to fix this in https://github.com/telotortium/org-mode
> > > (branch org-clock-table-extend-today-until-block). I've submitted a
> > > copyright assignment with the FSF.

> > I confirm your copyright assignment is okay.

> > Can you send a patch against Org's current master branch?

> > Thanks!

> > --
> >   Bastien



> --
> Robert Irelan
> rirelan@gmail.com



-- 
Robert Irelan
rirelan@gmail.com

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi, is there anything else I should do on this patch?

Would you mind sending it to the ML? It easier, at least for me, to
review or apply.

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou                                                0x80A93738

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 490 bytes --]

I've rebased against latest master and attached the patch.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:05 AM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,

> Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> > Hi, is there anything else I should do on this patch?

> Would you mind sending it to the ML? It easier, at least for me, to
> review or apply.

> Thank you.

> Regards,

> --
> Nicolas Goaziou                                                0x80A93738



-- 
Robert Irelan
rirelan@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Make-org-extend-today-until-work-for-clocktable-bloc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2910 bytes --]

From 8b679dbd5a308561209c142bf806d13e2ee0ec10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Irelan <rmirelan@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:18:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Make org-extend-today-until work for clocktable block

org-clock: Properly handle `org-extend-today-until' in clock tables

 * lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-special-range): Handle non-default
   `org-extend-today-until' when generating a clock table with the
   `:block` directive.

 Reported-by: Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com>
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2018-04/msg00294.html>
---
 lisp/org-clock.el | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index d727fa150..5eaff8c8a 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -2201,13 +2201,17 @@ have priority."
 	(`lastq     (setq key 'quarter shift -1))))
     ;; Prepare start and end times depending on KEY's type.
     (pcase key
-      ((or `day `today) (setq m 0 h 0 h1 24 d (+ d shift)))
+      ((or `day `today) (setq m 0
+                              h org-extend-today-until
+                              h1 (+ 24 org-extend-today-until)
+                              d (+ d shift)))
       ((or `week `thisweek)
        (let* ((ws (or wstart 1))
 	      (diff (+ (* -7 shift) (if (= dow 0) (- 7 ws) (- dow ws)))))
-	 (setq m 0 h 0 d (- d diff) d1 (+ 7 d))))
+	 (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d (- d diff) d1 (+ 7 d))))
       ((or `month `thismonth)
-       (setq h 0 m 0 d (or mstart 1) month (+ month shift) month1 (1+ month)))
+       (setq h org-extend-today-until m 0 d (or mstart 1)
+             month (+ month shift) month1 (1+ month)))
       ((or `quarter `thisq)
        ;; Compute if this shift remains in this year.  If not, compute
        ;; how many years and quarters we have to shift (via floor*) and
@@ -2225,14 +2229,16 @@ have priority."
 	     (setq shiftedy (- y (+ 1 (nth 0 tmp)))
 		   shiftedm (- 13 (* 3 (nth 1 tmp)))
 		   shiftedq (- 5 (nth 1 tmp)))))
-	 (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month shiftedm month1 (+ 3 shiftedm) y shiftedy))
+	 (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1
+               month shiftedm month1 (+ 3 shiftedm) y shiftedy))
 	((> (+ q shift) 0)		; Shift is within this year.
 	 (setq shiftedq (+ q shift))
 	 (setq shiftedy y)
 	 (let ((qshift (* 3 (1- (+ q shift)))))
-	   (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month (+ 1 qshift) month1 (+ 4 qshift))))))
+	   (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1
+                 month (+ 1 qshift) month1 (+ 4 qshift))))))
       ((or `year `thisyear)
-       (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month 1 y (+ y shift) y1 (1+ y)))
+       (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1 month 1 y (+ y shift) y1 (1+ y)))
       ((or `interactive `untilnow))	; Special cases, ignore them.
       (_ (user-error "No such time block %s" key)))
     ;; Format start and end times according to AS-STRINGS.
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> I've rebased against latest master and attached the patch.

It looks good, thank you.

Would you mind proving a couple of regression tests, e.g., in
"test-org-clock.el"?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Robert Irelan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 464 bytes --]

I've attached a patch on top of my first patch, containing tests.

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:38 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I've rebased against latest master and attached the patch.
>
> It looks good, thank you.
>
> Would you mind proving a couple of regression tests, e.g., in
> "test-org-clock.el"?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou



-- 
Robert Irelan
rirelan@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: 0002-Add-tests-for-clocktable-behavior-under-org-extend-t.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2595 bytes --]

From a7b1a3163d36a7d715abcce096c60ec50bb40658 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Irelan <rmirelan@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:33:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add tests for clocktable behavior under
 org-extend-today-until

---
 testing/lisp/test-org-clock.el | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-org-clock.el b/testing/lisp/test-org-clock.el
index e85325c14..abb3637bd 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-org-clock.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-org-clock.el
@@ -979,5 +979,55 @@ CLOCK: [2017-12-27 Wed 08:00]--[2017-12-27 Wed 16:00] =>  8:00"
 		  (concat ":step day :tstart \"<2017-12-25 Mon>\" "
 			  ":tend \"<2017-12-27 Wed 23:59>\" :stepskip0 t")))))))
 
+(ert-deftest test-org-clock/clocktable/extend-today-until ()
+  "Test assignment of clock time to days in presence of \"org-extend-today-until\"."
+  ;; Basic test of :block with org-extend-today-until - the report for
+  ;; 2017-09-30 should include the time clocked on 2017-10-01 before
+  ;; 04:00.
+  (should
+   (equal "| Headline     | Time   |
+|--------------+--------|
+| *Total time* | *2:00* |
+|--------------+--------|
+| Foo          | 2:00   |"
+	  (org-test-with-temp-text
+	   "* Foo
+CLOCK: [2017-09-30 Sat 12:00]--[2017-09-30 Sat 13:00] =>  1:00
+CLOCK: [2017-10-01 Sun 02:00]--[2017-10-01 Sun 03:00] =>  1:00
+CLOCK: [2017-10-01 Sun 11:00]--[2017-10-01 Sun 13:00] =>  2:00"
+	   (setq-local org-extend-today-until 4)
+	   (let ((system-time-locale "en_US"))
+	     (test-org-clock-clocktable-contents
+	      ":block 2017-09-30")))))
+
+  ;; Week-length block - time on Monday before 04:00 should be
+  ;; assigned to previous week.
+  (should
+   (equal "
+Weekly report starting on: [2017-10-01 Sun]
+| Headline     | Time   |
+|--------------+--------|
+| *Total time* | *2:00* |
+|--------------+--------|
+| Foo          | 2:00   |
+
+Weekly report starting on: [2017-10-02 Mon]
+| Headline     | Time   |
+|--------------+--------|
+| *Total time* | *2:00* |
+|--------------+--------|
+| Foo          | 2:00   |
+"
+	  (org-test-with-temp-text
+	   "* Foo
+CLOCK: [2017-10-01 Sun 12:00]--[2017-10-01 Sun 13:00] =>  1:00
+CLOCK: [2017-10-02 Mon 02:00]--[2017-10-02 Mon 03:00] =>  1:00
+CLOCK: [2017-10-02 Mon 11:00]--[2017-10-02 Mon 13:00] =>  2:00"
+	   (setq-local org-extend-today-until 4)
+	   (let ((system-time-locale "en_US"))
+	     (test-org-clock-clocktable-contents
+	      ":step week :block 2017-10 :stepskip0 t"))))))
+
+
 (provide 'test-org-clock)
 ;;; test-org-clock.el end here
-- 
2.18.0.rc2.346.g013aa6912e-goog


[-- Attachment #3: 0001-Make-org-extend-today-until-work-for-clocktable-bloc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2918 bytes --]

From dceba0d0964bce75cf78246f33becd0fbe543b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Irelan <rmirelan@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:18:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Make org-extend-today-until work for clocktable block

org-clock: Properly handle `org-extend-today-until' in clock tables

 * lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-special-range): Handle non-default
   `org-extend-today-until' when generating a clock table with the
   `:block` directive.

 Reported-by: Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com>
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2018-04/msg00294.html>
---
 lisp/org-clock.el | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index b769a4fed..f2562fb6d 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -2200,13 +2200,17 @@ have priority."
 	(`lastq     (setq key 'quarter shift -1))))
     ;; Prepare start and end times depending on KEY's type.
     (pcase key
-      ((or `day `today) (setq m 0 h 0 h1 24 d (+ d shift)))
+      ((or `day `today) (setq m 0
+                              h org-extend-today-until
+                              h1 (+ 24 org-extend-today-until)
+                              d (+ d shift)))
       ((or `week `thisweek)
        (let* ((ws (or wstart 1))
 	      (diff (+ (* -7 shift) (if (= dow 0) (- 7 ws) (- dow ws)))))
-	 (setq m 0 h 0 d (- d diff) d1 (+ 7 d))))
+	 (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d (- d diff) d1 (+ 7 d))))
       ((or `month `thismonth)
-       (setq h 0 m 0 d (or mstart 1) month (+ month shift) month1 (1+ month)))
+       (setq h org-extend-today-until m 0 d (or mstart 1)
+             month (+ month shift) month1 (1+ month)))
       ((or `quarter `thisq)
        ;; Compute if this shift remains in this year.  If not, compute
        ;; how many years and quarters we have to shift (via floor*) and
@@ -2224,14 +2228,16 @@ have priority."
 	     (setq shiftedy (- y (+ 1 (nth 0 tmp)))
 		   shiftedm (- 13 (* 3 (nth 1 tmp)))
 		   shiftedq (- 5 (nth 1 tmp)))))
-	 (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month shiftedm month1 (+ 3 shiftedm) y shiftedy))
+	 (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1
+               month shiftedm month1 (+ 3 shiftedm) y shiftedy))
 	((> (+ q shift) 0)		; Shift is within this year.
 	 (setq shiftedq (+ q shift))
 	 (setq shiftedy y)
 	 (let ((qshift (* 3 (1- (+ q shift)))))
-	   (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month (+ 1 qshift) month1 (+ 4 qshift))))))
+	   (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1
+                 month (+ 1 qshift) month1 (+ 4 qshift))))))
       ((or `year `thisyear)
-       (setq m 0 h 0 d 1 month 1 y (+ y shift) y1 (1+ y)))
+       (setq m 0 h org-extend-today-until d 1 month 1 y (+ y shift) y1 (1+ y)))
       ((or `interactive `untilnow))	; Special cases, ignore them.
       (_ (user-error "No such time block %s" key)))
     ;; Format start and end times according to AS-STRINGS.
-- 
2.18.0.rc2.346.g013aa6912e-goog

Re: Does :block field of clocktable respect org-extend-today-until?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Robert Irelan <rirelan@gmail.com> writes:

> I've attached a patch on top of my first patch, containing tests.

Applied. Thank you!

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou