From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaushal Modi Subject: Re: stable org-plus-contrib Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:00:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8760h8h162.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87pofgl82d.fsf@jaunder.io> <87ziejlh6p.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113befc8731fb4054f3f2ce0" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nhq-0006Bm-7N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:00:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nho-0003m9-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:00:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:32940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nho-0003kq-LC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:00:32 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r17so110229lfg.0 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 06:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ziejlh6p.fsf@russet.org.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Phillip Lord , Michael Alan Dorman Cc: emacs-org list --001a113befc8731fb4054f3f2ce0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, May 11, 2017, 8:20 AM Phillip Lord wrote: > > Really? That's rather confusing. So, it means that a bug here is a bug > in a release version? > Well, a bug's not a bug till it is seen :) What is the buggy behavior that you find in the Elpa version? Simply put, the Melpa version has the latest weekly cut from the maint branch (minus the contrib packages), the org Elpa version is the same but with contrib packages. So those are stable versions. If one finds a bug in those, then they get fixed when reported. New big features get added to the master (devel) branch. That said, I have been using the master branch as my daily driver for over a year. As of now I don't see any bug that affects my workflow. > -- Kaushal Modi --001a113befc8731fb4054f3f2ce0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 11, 2017, 8:20 AM P= hillip Lord <phillip.lord@= russet.org.uk> wrote:

Really? That's rather confusing. So, it means that a bug here is a bug<= br> in a release version?

Well, a bug= 's not a bug till it is seen :)

What is the bu= ggy behavior that you find in the Elpa version?

Si= mply put, the Melpa version has the latest weekly cut from the maint branch= (minus the contrib packages), the org Elpa version is the same but with co= ntrib packages. So those are stable versions. If one finds a bug in those, = then they get fixed when reported.=C2=A0

New big f= eatures get added to the master (devel) branch.=C2=A0

<= div>That said, I have been using the master branch as my daily driver for o= ver a year. As of now I don't see any bug that affects my workflow.=C2= =A0
--

Kaushal Modi

--001a113befc8731fb4054f3f2ce0--