From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Harkins <jamshark70@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:50:04 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFniQ7UGANaqJJF+QmFj9Q9=mkkNjrYhx2Xrvp_EebCE+5HRsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <jamshark70@gmail.com> <87d32w6cqj.wl%jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net>
	<29702.1344745760@alphaville>
	<CAFniQ7UX8M5CaxL8rA+0UWZ4m5gpjnN1gUAeXAQcjVxoPSV+BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87628o33hf.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cfcdf0d558a404c70da96e
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60127)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jamshark70@gmail.com>) id 1T0Ts6-0003Bn-TZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:50:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jamshark70@gmail.com>) id 1T0Ts5-0004qq-LE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:50:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87628o33hf.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--14dae9cfcdf0d558a404c70da96e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Aug 12, 2012 4:42 PM, "Bastien" <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> > But the doc was rather misleading, suggesting that some editorial
> > attention would be warranted.
>
> Can you send a patch to fix the docs?

I wouldn't mind doing so, but I haven't the foggiest how it's supposed to
work.

hjh

--14dae9cfcdf0d558a404c70da96e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<p><br>
On Aug 12, 2012 4:42 PM, &quot;Bastien&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:bzg@gnu.org">bzg@gnu.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; But the doc was rather misleading, suggesting that some editorial<br>
&gt; &gt; attention would be warranted.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Can you send a patch to fix the docs?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#39;t mind doing so, but I haven&#39;t the foggiest how it&#39;s supposed to work.</p>
<p>hjh<br>
</p>

--14dae9cfcdf0d558a404c70da96e--