From: Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>
To: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Effort entry and confusing effort estimates
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:22:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFdBzEoA2UQ6cv7g=Gvt1ZcBDZf_j=Xy5TLkzWJ5X+am2oeT5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFdBzEpPsT_Km1sLvR-TKP6W2R36QR0g3VBzyuGB1FBo+rnd_w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1169 bytes --]
Doh. I get the math now. 3d is 3*8h = 1d. Ok. Confusing but I get it.
But I'm still confused what 'org-set-effort' expects/interprets compared to
'org-clock-modify-effort-estimate'. Any clarification will be much
appreciated.
Thanks,
-k.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking into effort and time tracking and have a few questions about
> efforts,
>
> 1) What is the difference between C-c C-x C-e and C-c C-x e?
>
> When I set an effort while clocked in, C-c C-x C-e asks for an effort and
> formats it in a format I understand such as 00:30 or 1d. When not clocked
> in, I have to use C-c C-x e (no CTRL for the last one) and it doesn't seem
> to parse my entry for a timestamp or convert from 8h to 1d. For example, I
> can enter an effort of "aoeu" and it accepts that.
>
> 2) When clocked in and using C-c C-x C-e, the conversion seems buggy:
>
> I enter -> converted to
> 1d -> 08:00
> 2d -> 16:00
> 3d -> 1d 00:00
> 4d -> 1d 08:00
> 7d -> 2d 08:00
> 1w -> 1d 16:00
>
> I get that 1 day is 8 hours, and 2d 8h == 1d 16h, but I'm still confused
> why 2d is 16h and 3d is 1d.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -k.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1845 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 0:32 Effort entry and confusing effort estimates Ken Mankoff
2013-05-21 3:22 ` Ken Mankoff [this message]
2013-05-21 10:39 ` Bastien
2013-05-21 11:52 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2013-05-21 12:22 ` Bastien
2013-05-28 11:13 ` [PATCH] Remove org-time-clocksum-use-effort-durations Lawrence Mitchell
2013-05-21 13:10 ` Effort entry and confusing effort estimates Ken Mankoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFdBzEoA2UQ6cv7g=Gvt1ZcBDZf_j=Xy5TLkzWJ5X+am2oeT5A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mankoff@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).