From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id kPSdD5QlpWAoTwEAgWs5BA
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 16:49:56 +0200
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id UN51C5QlpWCyNgAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:49:56 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B37695CF
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 16:49:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:44198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ljNWD-0005U0-E3
	for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:49:53 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34248)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bdarcus@gmail.com>) id 1ljNTX-0002t7-W1
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:47:08 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:34511)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bdarcus@gmail.com>) id 1ljNTW-0002G3-AX
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:47:07 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id r12so14334072wrp.1
 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 07:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=bh51WVCzzXf1bRPXA2CdjFdw+g/WTQfG/Gu2D+7wUJE=;
 b=u51/wm56HKdYY7iS/kuCtypK6uRYRHcgDh6sh36C9YRY37VXfWvTNjDhZVce19mlpt
 05eGlNO9sdsV9A25LPjkv570f4NsegAnIWTwTEdu2zDyY6s5cfJfAhAlWSCCCWRDgF9S
 xsAu61FNiCEo03Wcan/NypR/d+eV1vikirfxoKhA3UkecXB9uU7pFcCGPld9AuDrrvxd
 S6AsYyQu6Yu+Wt9edbRDFBJ9KfZsGOkAabJSSbHdzAnxJwl+Nwpd8GDX7ztDLAFPvODl
 qG376UWzeWmOYTukGbaNQWribduzBMh0EPTHRew2ukQa3qrsULPGLPTlteVTEsnYtgtu
 2Dqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=bh51WVCzzXf1bRPXA2CdjFdw+g/WTQfG/Gu2D+7wUJE=;
 b=b139vTiAHwei7hdiOVzga8nN2Dl7SaNGmWMqGACzEDOS+JMbKWfcLmJ8SKOtO1y/Je
 XBVCUHNeOFLpXhSzQOOV9SzGFlimK0LR0U3brLF1PF+BKD2VRselGGbCPyaUknBm8ZkS
 T5SLLo61qKj9+Zw+7mNORdVwI7YOGz02ynStB9dZzIJKEnmtFhc1RMYhSMnTnJCwMb0V
 9kP076aj/K172jL4Vib7wGXckqaMuZhkdjWsYWiu7vsqDd1ejJpXewQzHwxvezojBeoD
 O+BuUnRZQoZmwlq3oUSJDa7xYc6+uuqWNtRtaCIXkBoAuauEoZllGl8FsvDTJWqjQNN3
 RhZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WsYHYtWaJ5TYKlG75Dm7Kh2WjA3ojgyS95h9P1XP65rDnghF/
 bGFiIpLZeyb+PbhdDr/rrraeNr0IClG4U900OHM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbNEvmpkvu7zlBjYAnaf4D7rumjIvOX6zNhqKTDtWyB6s9/kHTC0wnU8yorp8PFNFHXWqBMdezz6mNxdZFidI=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:bc46:: with SMTP id a6mr14850062wrh.232.1621435624352; 
 Wed, 19 May 2021 07:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87bl985b3h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <10eb58b2-5da3-b768-cf56-87aa447346d7@mailbox.org>
 <CAF-FPGOz8bRH602p0hzRDQJF4+YQGMY+ppRyEz4QFfiP=1GboQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5a23225d-118a-d08e-a1d7-f9fe3791c1bf@mailbox.org>
 <87lf8a4z3a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <52aade3f-3e8e-bd56-109e-c6cfd9254915@mailbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <52aade3f-3e8e-bd56-109e-c6cfd9254915@mailbox.org>
From: "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 10:46:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF-FPGPepH7EFRQ72BKn4gFFLYyODpnnVbKimdiXxp=AocQmUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation
 processor
To: Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d;
 envelope-from=bdarcus@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: org-mode-email <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
 Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1621435795;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=bh51WVCzzXf1bRPXA2CdjFdw+g/WTQfG/Gu2D+7wUJE=;
	b=lrVPlNj9bfMwhvNAcas8rR28QVzf3Bc5/JhpHZXw9iGtJJcDueDvKx1owcXJ2GbW7UICY+
	U92YXZk6H8wa9g15oLGWvjcC6er84nEKhG7PhFrG95RogSRHXpUQ4UIuhaLYjaWRlLOmqH
	1ykmJW6TwXgGG8j4ng4JqJoXMYntrm+vylLq/y7aXsuLjj3zbfo7PEaYtees8sFlxQAo2H
	AFJpE/55/i+xM7RFEHW2ZE3OdklfeN9SFutUlabRIJ22Qt5SnvTHHRB5z9zpXr42YsOauU
	A1C9xA4Ae7Rj0aZmKQaqmvpzUd0DU6bGpTSNh+q5zkQ2Kkv9M6LAhIAhjRb6wA==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621435795; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=n7KGOzxd9E4m6+DUJc5iiCj0VqJLWYTVEeztwo8Lt4pl4SbY3CfrYeSb92eRvrDYU3cQPh
	ucSZFXkKROW944BPqTYwVmTX+Z2X++2xik53o868ZiX9B47NF1Gn43s0sw2vQHE8zmiauX
	yg6AfgSU3lzs6jojd+NtUexgBwn1HH/ntSzzpyQ8N1K95PYTZH+ilrb+L1EjGyhFKrymsH
	X2/VKPlXvEnKkr65431lis6B/hiajSZ6aKApOIiyn9XYRHy1y7Y3t5sM3KjLByXrW0NKyc
	NizgpEPPpFbCcTAnW1HNj6N086pyy0K7uWBKYUxUij5YiUNbYpwJ+amDRNOtiQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="u51/wm56";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.14
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="u51/wm56";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8B37695CF
X-Spam-Score: -3.14
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-TUID: s4C9tW9g5pDp

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:31 AM Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> wrote:

> In that case, I'd think that note/bare => footcitecite isn't a
> particular good fit. Footcitetext puts the citation in a footnote, just
> that it doesn't print a footnote mark in a running text.

And, just as a general rule, not all sub-styles are relevant for all styles.

> > One problem is there is no "\cite", or "\parencite". I though they would
> > make a good fit for the default style, "\cite" being the "bare" variant
> > of "\parencite", and "\autocite" could be moved to a "auto" style. I'm
> > not sure where to put \cite, then.
>
> Why not just add a cite/parens style?

Probably makes sense.

> \cite could be [cite/bare: ...]
>
> Regarding \autocite being the default:
> I think one strong argument in favor of this is that people may want to
> switch between different citation export processors. So if you typeset
> your article with latex you may want to use biblatex. But if the journal
> accepts submissions only as docx files you'll have to switch to a
> CSL-based citeproc.

Yes, this is the use case I was thinking of when suggesting a lot of this.

In fact, it's an approach I'm likely to use myself!

> Here, the default is to wrap the citation either in
> a footnote or in parentheses, depending on the style.
> So, to ensure portability of documents across export systems [cite:
> @doe] should give similar results with different systems, and I think
> \autocite would be the best choice. (By the way, it's also the way
> pandoc implements this.)

Bruce