From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id IAxwBMm5rmCmWAEAgWs5BA
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 23:12:41 +0200
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1 with LMTPS
	id YNgDAMm5rmB4AQAAbx9fmQ
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:12:41 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774CC14F21
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 23:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:60166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lm0pR-0004V7-CV
	for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:12:37 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36698)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bdarcus@gmail.com>) id 1lm0p3-0004Ur-N1
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:12:13 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]:43764)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bdarcus@gmail.com>) id 1lm0p1-0004Vm-Vq
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 17:12:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id
 n5-20020a1c72050000b0290192e1f9a7e1so1292187wmc.2
 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=KTStqSfZ4LMfsB8AidijohPnrV+kovUUUBiR21LaS5M=;
 b=heY9JRtrAvFZnOJjUXc9KeqvS1dshcJ2a3HcEzDhDk9ZTQ+36PMIfj6kbbr5VzSPBZ
 QusYSfH0KJtPaQOVzFwAkubEunU3Mmeh18oH+4VKxyuYfXnChn9Twk3x3huYRD0XrL8J
 6phA1IMAq62I7+OYChEt4lhRqCN3dEQpyYDocycX5RBl9TxylNmfvgYEi7shF1j9nC+j
 l/9D6RajqVWVHtSULtKjZfjo+6MDfYl4q6zjAMu1YcbLBeaLpxrzAqarIiZJk4tWoIiD
 FvlAhI76hi/RX91wBlxIHhV05zwngVFlmtJyWu93MimYo99lgGdxSyMztVxe/Nz6Dp8W
 utOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=KTStqSfZ4LMfsB8AidijohPnrV+kovUUUBiR21LaS5M=;
 b=TUznZHR4d/UH/t3s8/08DSLsromSYMB83k0vhtnRN/t1GHQyzK4QU605OQjyL/CS2i
 PnEr41MQNNJkdjjfJ8K5chhSLH3yNI1x3EkowVBghGitc6uu4QWcqHNHKn7eBn26G3r1
 0PmqsbtLfILGH6hxYleZ8Mlw6C6f7hugWaLUxQvm2mkk8W6EjxlS1GASY4B5j3C1mH55
 b0Y5omuYGhaaWtSlacmO1bTJwH7qY0ApmaYjaKTj1OmdgUFbu/KzqV3vdYwMcJnMyipb
 98bVUYEOfgx6kA21JQ5ikb7vHqDby4FRmgC3/GanTOerFYXKna5CeZ8VOwjCYTH/eDXW
 ow7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305ccGCamlvDakv+L2zG04CSrCWRRnerrIEdrJ4MZyXB132FumC
 /2Xb/MQXfg21x6O6Rb8xpXNNJsmd+m87nGCFE37Zm5SPJU9kmA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2TS4UKWWlUigS2tgyZZqAwUBwras+xoY3B8q8K2tsRNyUAjSACrvvlhMV2873SCC5gjIFS1u6m4/CTAC8iK0=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c405:: with SMTP id k5mr283327wmi.133.1622063529230;
 Wed, 26 May 2021 14:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87y2c1dym9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87y2c1dym9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
From: "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:11:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF-FPGPKYojRS7qTXgjABnDnvQYAU9H=R7VsuHvOmPGbLYohoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor
To: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A1s_Simonyi?= <andras.simonyi@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32d;
 envelope-from=bdarcus@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1622063560;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=KTStqSfZ4LMfsB8AidijohPnrV+kovUUUBiR21LaS5M=;
	b=O2P2/nNZd8eOsQrO4/dZW/cjyZzx/4bH3sgxH9BlqP8HCWf9JCaHIVbiOJrxWeysUgaEln
	noDGLNryHkwE4yull86f5HMsVVZ4zP49Kn6IXLaiKF/hc5AAaLTh4YYbHV64PqaruwJ1Bk
	AdS121P+Se7edKbVIWJScCVZ+pY9v4uSFRu06loXbdMAW9SjLbQ5IVVR9M8vi+M3qax8HD
	NAiEh7BH8fs6u60VFgNgpMx3hqGqXvVjkB2azEKwK57VhHeQUY1wgRh7WdrYWpsh84fkNk
	i46U5GgIRIviM5CiLX8fy2TRmyw8dexosyLfEmPpocgUWOk4iAkw0vIy0txtGg==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622063560; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=ox627tHfYTF4y7mClBsTgWDG66TtgMZxmGnFR+NRSVFwTtCCds6Fbs11tyUL2CufvIJnzW
	78s0lPapPUUpnTKRMrYYi071y//yQaPu6LhjSUrt6CfWja62cSwOVOd3R+jYBXWB+mifQR
	chjjxoELkpwDfOQ8qY7pN/jUIhP1HDr8b4BByYSimXQfBKuI4egXlrxnLNEyDtu1veO7Xy
	yHOAA/3WE4MQY08wlgoXzcfVeyHmW2KmJoB4IV2cZ2Oa4XmZmsDwjOvYydxHaMVU4ikY4m
	OnlGRVHUOw3Ll2L8FzjRZ1tN5GpmeIEiQ2d5oo4L1FnZGFVcJDa7k6x/t27qQw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=heY9JRtr;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.13
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=heY9JRtr;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 774CC14F21
X-Spam-Score: -3.13
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com
X-TUID: JShYa5MXvOeA

Hi Nicolas,

I'll take a close look at this and test it over the coming days, but
in the meantime, on two more general points:

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:39 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

First, names:

> I called it `csl' instead of `citeproc'. It is a bit ambiguous, but it
> is shorter, and "org-cite-csl" prefix sounds less redudant than
> "org-cite-citeproc...".  But I know this is a weak argument, so if you think "citeproc"
> is still more appropriate, I can revisit this.

>From my perspective, that's totally fine, and arguably better: csl
export processor for citeproc library.

The citeproc name is just a convention for the processors that's
developed over time I think mostly because people couldn't be bothered
to come up with better names. I actually wrote the very first one, in
XSLT, called citeproc-xsl.

I think CSL would be more widely known among users though.

And this processor doesn't actually do the formatting, so it makes sense.

Second, this:

> Also, I don't expect a different CSL-based citation processor any time soon, so it should be fine.

Well, I'll ask you the same question I asked Andras recently:

What if a developer has the idea to hook up one of the new, very fast,
csl libraries: either the haskell version associated with pandoc, or
the rust-based version associated with Zotero?

Possible reasons they might want to do that: performance and/or
compliance/features.

Could you make sure this module is coded in such a way that it should
be relatively straightforward to do that?

Bruce