Hello,
I think, as a starter, we should discuss and agree on how the UI should
Ingo Lohmar <i.lohmar@gmail.com> writes:
> What I have in mind for starters:
>
> Add orthogonal internal functions that can handle *all* sensible
> combinations of requirements. Then rewrite existing commands in terms
> of these, but possibly adding new ones.
>
> I would not want to break any workflows, of course. But in the *long*
> run, we could rethink if the existing commands and their prefix-arg
> behavior are really what users want, or if we provide other ones by
> default.
>
> Does that sound reasonable, or are there any grave obstacles I did not
> consider, or any hard reasons why such changes could not be accepted?
be. IMO, implementation follows, not the other way around.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou