From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:00:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAjq1mcQcozyWyivqXxOP3MAqyD7yYudy5oPbx1=02xX-9J76Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPNHJwG6FDwg7NjNU2HW-i83YvxaXnDcL_oXxWhEJJcGJryjbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zj0fd07u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a8sehqdk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45653)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1ZeO7r-0005wX-KJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:00:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1ZeO7q-0006sY-Ml
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:00:55 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:34867)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1ZeO7q-0006sF-HG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:00:54 -0400
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so162974164wic.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87a8sehqdk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Monday, 21 Sep 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

> Only that the koma-script classes are arguably better defaults than the
> actual defaults...  Personally, I cannot see any reason to use the
> standard article/report/letter classes!

Good to know! I've never tried anything other than the default! :) Now
I'm curious.