From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Bug: org -> org export ignores latex blocks [8.3.4 (8.3.4-50-g83e373-elpaplus @ /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160509/)] Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:27:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87twi343jk.fsf@freedom.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wGM-0007ZZ-CP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:27:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wGK-0001Cg-00 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:27:09 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::243]:36781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wGJ-0001CZ-Rk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:27:07 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id c189so9474557vkb.3 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 12:27:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Andrea , emacs-orgmode , Nicolas Goaziou On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Kaushal Modi wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:16 PM John Hendy wrote: >> >> Ah. I always wondered about that since the change is reported for 9.0 >> but it's in effect for me on: >> >> Org-mode version 8.3.4 (release_8.3.4-753-gda4db33 @ ~/.elisp/org/lisp/) >> >> But I've obviously built from git. Simple case would be for Andrea to >> just try it and let us know :) Other than that, I'd defer to Nicholas >> to say whether or not this should be going on. > > > If you just git clone, you clone the bleeding-edge master branch with awesome new features :) You are on master branch built recently. > > > I agree that the version number is confusing for people building from the master branch. It's figuratively 9.0+, but org-version still gives 8.3.4-xxx-gxxxxxxx. Indeed, I didn't know that. I agree, if it's basically a 9.0-prerelease analog, knowing that 9.0 features are building (via the version number) would be nice to know. Or maybe that's common knowledge other than in my head :) Thanks, John > > It would have been nice if the master branch built version showed a different numerical version number than the one on the maint branch. Or probably some prefix like dev/master? Nicolas? > -- > > -- > Kaushal Modi