Yes! Thank you Bastien!
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:26 AM Bastien <
bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> Also, my question is still open: is there any strong reason to provide,
> out of the box, two template mechanisms in Org? This is genuine
> question.
No, there is no good reason for two template mechanism, and if we can
rely on org-insert-structure-template only, while still being able to
complete <* at the beginning of the line, that'd be perfect to me.
I definitely agree with this.
I voted (slightly late) for having org-tempo in org-modules--not out of any love of org-tempo itself, but more because it feels to me like an extremely natural way to create blocks.
The tab key is extremely easy to hit, and having a fully formed block created by typing a short string of characters makes the tab-completion lizard-part of my brain happy in a way that key chord combos simply don't.
I think this is partly because I personally can't do key chords at the same rate I can type a string of characters--even if they require technically the same number of keystrokes.
Like, I can type a 10 character command significantly faster than I can hit a number of different combinations of keys that also happen to be 10 keypresses.
I just personally find it really nice!
Thanks Bastien for all your work!
--Diego
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:50 PM Bastien <
bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
Hi all,
here are the results of the survey, with *47* voters:
- 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
- 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
- 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t
- 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t
- 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t
- 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t
- 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t
- 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t
- 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules
I've changed the values of these options in master:
- 35+2 : org-src-tab-acts-natively => t
- 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t
- 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
- 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
I've *not* changed the values of these options:
- 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t
- 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules
- 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t
- 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t
- 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t
- 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t
The reason for not changing the default of org-special-ctrl-k is that
23 < 47/2. Also, I think it was a mistake to propose this: even the
org-special- prefix should have warned me. The org-special-* options
should be nil by default, and while org-special-ctrl-k may be useful,
it is as useful as org-special-ctrl-a/e, which sticks to nil too.
The reason for not adding org-tempo to org-modules is, on top of the
poll being 22 < 47/2, that the current discussion on the list leaves
room for improvements that may lead to move org-tempo from Org's core
anyway.
The reason for not changing the four other options is that they did
not get enough votes.
I've push the change for the three options in current master.
Thanks again for participating to the poll and to the discussions!
Best,
--
Bastien