Missed removing a debug message. Here is the correct patch. Best,
Tom

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 10:22 PM Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>    I've attached a patch with a first pass implementation that I think
> resolves most of the issues. It probably needs a few tests to go along
> with it, but I think it is the simplest way forward. I tried to make the
> changes without disrupting the org-babel info structure, but it comes
> with the cost of having to pull out :coderef-prefix in a number of separate
> contexts. Best,
> Tom
>
> > If possible, I'd like not to conflate current issue with switches
> > deprecation, which needs to be discussed separately.
>
> We can decouple them, so not an issue. The attached patch implements
> the header arg equivalents of -r and -l without making any changes to the
> existing switch behavior.
>
> > What do you mean by "it is impossible for the user to specify their own
> > coderef regexp that can be used in both cases"? In particular, what is
> > a coderef regexp in this context? I know about coderef format, but
> > I don't think users are supposed to provide a regexp here.
>
> I did a first pass implementation and realized that allowing users to
> specify coderef-regexp is a bad idea. The attached patch fixes the
> divergent behavior of org-bable-tangle-single-block and provides a
> standard way to specify a :coderef-prefix regexp so that empty
> comments can be stripped.