From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id oID0K3tgsGPTBwAAbAwnHQ
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 17:16:59 +0100
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id sFcrLHtgsGPkBAAAauVa8A
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 17:16:59 +0100
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1132A9FA
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 17:16:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1pBeWn-00081B-48; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 11:16:09 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <tgbugs@gmail.com>) id 1pBeWl-00080z-Gg
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 11:16:07 -0500
Received: from mail-yw1-x1135.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <tgbugs@gmail.com>)
 id 1pBeWj-0005bx-Ry; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 11:16:07 -0500
Received: by mail-yw1-x1135.google.com with SMTP id
 00721157ae682-417b63464c6so335274987b3.8; 
 Sat, 31 Dec 2022 08:16:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=yxyduDaT2ULWMtdg2yXJcBUmibGYWEdeoJTZQLk8tFg=;
 b=Nc9ryoz6hH2hR0qNAhJKh7XU0R/zTVtm26kIUB0D4/9fnAIDl0FHChJpCInh6kW8cp
 nvCSokC79l0MrF+hs4YtzUw/0efIZ+pVMH8Sov8qG+3cSZgB6EltsSRpSevAWt0WcaC7
 eLSczcXMyEil2VPCbShiZbV8apzRDl4pqBCCgdk6KMxWqHYWLZgfsUfXltSCxXN/3o3b
 YnY5DgU0KvzAh89cR+cc+nMRNk479IEwMuG9XTh3Pd4uzddaJEB2vUk1fg1fZK5CjsIT
 mRy4+nNmgQdSs37FJ/DELugum0LlBeSNn7opsKAxx9xJTNn59KjXpzws4o31LcxK0v4a
 C0zA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to;
 bh=yxyduDaT2ULWMtdg2yXJcBUmibGYWEdeoJTZQLk8tFg=;
 b=Ie+zJb2rQ5stzOQKj6caORuvxA3X3qVg1p8LZGfSlO3lMb0OW3cfvLu3L/k7cbimWC
 xtPlcO1EzGz46ILSfagPRavcK0XIgLbqCd0/sgjS8Eu0hxLTOJcEXa8jvTBdDfHRUHey
 MCQJlSI/jQQupPRLqPkUZslEKLCJxuZ3WpqyKpeRgMcin7b6Cnbq9GHKweffLrNVNUfu
 dS45E2exz9v5EHXVCzPEDho6Dj07h59NmkaLSjv2A93dSdT3keZiZFEvxhf/eJIaOAwJ
 LB9/+6cG+MCswaZiqcdE1Bpqb6jJE2N1qbXYHl4OjnD+EEIaTAzSk32Z9hcFl4UA9cAc
 aExQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpenlSJchzrWElRZsbFGO8dcVzKeJBwWaN/37ArwzbsVlquQdFw
 3lIMYFgB8ZxXw4FhccvzsegOyyYsKsnpFchNAxg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuPeCoP0wgPzpQxFEsbn9Pg8DA1/7T9Yjbhw+ryXjAILrefYAOCMRASUXdhI3/LGm8WBA1rGuJ7wvtDg4OInxA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:ed4:b0:475:32f5:f655 with SMTP id
 cs20-20020a05690c0ed400b0047532f5f655mr2605363ywb.159.1672503363210; Sat, 31
 Dec 2022 08:16:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+G3_PNmnJ-ehnYOBkaOOsyNjeb-OJyoy+sg_g5v3AZVGiNoXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <tn3h08$1099$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <CA+G3_PNHe3J+PHzv_L+X1DR66TGc3sW5FxiJC5HqDd57N75P0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <87359ld5ye.fsf@kyleam.com>
 <CA+G3_PPEbiBFvADivF++x_c6s8hKtyTcy3nmBtTMd_OhBDDPyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <874ju0j538.fsf@localhost>
 <CA+G3_PMwyRrjwJp_AGxnV8P7LbqiPkGfLiQY4rziUo-xcjAUaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87k02fspxa.fsf@localhost> <87edsii4mo.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6xetbfn.fsf@localhost>
 <878rips273.fsf@bzg.fr>
 <CA+G3_PPvTv0u9_zyWRbN+jcqqnthb3KkG5uTDa9HFqBJPgGBag@mail.gmail.com>
 <878rinadlq.fsf@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <878rinadlq.fsf@localhost>
From: Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 11:15:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+G3_PMfa2z8hX7dCqOvMRyvXjy8Cush6W9tGkmYDHJU+zxCHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ob-core: add org-confirm-babel-evaluate-cell custom
 variable
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135;
 envelope-from=tgbugs@gmail.com; helo=mail-yw1-x1135.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Country: US
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1672503419;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=yxyduDaT2ULWMtdg2yXJcBUmibGYWEdeoJTZQLk8tFg=;
	b=AIKYMhkM6RJ+QygklOlpKX1aJvPDP32c6oedjjOdSm7/1uYQBvk2cnubgbP+VsXi9FuETm
	YFKKjS+vuJqcXnj7M18wnhVexrAobG35Q9PXXENyKGpIfG295SMTHs4oqvoNOFvNal5Y5g
	nwvHAcpf5Lh3FhpJVoOz888ck10AHAWgk9qtV68fEu8BXDRPT47/LHj/mb96X/Y8bzca8u
	nR8wRkV9ALmGxNiOD5NYsif1gTiGNB8tykWj6fCTMV17ZAVj8159VIhL+TWrxrBO/z0O83
	rOcXEYEPDS7qtuESpE+b5AHnB27sALnINvvbHdjiZN2YDeoiXbDGXmzPvHnfCw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Nc9ryoz6;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1672503419; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=Vg+/0YKWZ6J/QEXzcsM8jUFlik/R05vlQM5eiTKNuw1zxyWg/jZzHzDPUzb4q+1CA7kuUO
	AMRvjX9LaOv4vjVE0RXeEfnMkbKOEMBovCdGZ7GBBemgHfUcszxs78jQqQk+S3xYLT/2LG
	oegKahZgiRNef3avZWb3z0oBrFe1UOojmHKCB1WbaDEy05epa3FVd8Kwr4QjtwZ2jkQ852
	nw2ev9xYZLYC5buqAmUIWGkygmFCMrPYpNEKwCqzyYbjBnL0ZxGXMK0rFpgy/YfhfMdfpW
	99c3cAMMq7SZC9rd2S2EOLqDDGUOgmGD+CUrkh9+c0hkHCOIU8hAwL/io1Khcw==
X-Spam-Score: -4.63
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7D1132A9FA
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Nc9ryoz6;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org";
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.63
X-TUID: lc0nw/aZmPf+

> P.S. Considering intense discussion around the topic, what about
> reverting my commit from the release? We can then re-consider the whole
> design and apply something more elaborate later.

I was actually going to mention that in my previous
message but forgot. I think that given the potential
for disruption and our desire to do a good job on the
design of the new system I think it would make sense
to revert the commit from the release so that we don't
rush in trying to fix something under pressure without
taking the time we need to consider all the angles.

Best!
Tom