From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Aptel?= <aurelien.aptel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GSoC 2012 -- Elisp backend for Ragel
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:32:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+5B0FODTd+uUd8V-F2nFxNAderXNR2MNB8UwsK57mT0kX1AzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+5B0FPR2DCOdhiTBwCOf3Oq6nOBV8XL8=mqj37g_ekyNRYnEA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39630)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien.aptel@gmail.com>) id 1SARGV-0000MC-4V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:32:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien.aptel@gmail.com>) id 1SARGQ-00015A-Cn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:32:10 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:51249)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien.aptel@gmail.com>) id 1SARGQ-00014a-6K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:32:06 -0400
Received: by ghrr18 with SMTP id r18so1519554ghr.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+5B0FPR2DCOdhiTBwCOf3Oq6nOBV8XL8=mqj37g_ekyNRYnEA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Oops. Forgot the "Plan" section. I'm not sure about that one.

Plan:

The project has 2 clearly defined tasks:
* implement the backend
* replace the old parser

I'm still not sure what will take the most time and I'm tempted to
just have an almost-working backend as mid-term evaluation, working
backend as a final evaluation and the replacement of the old parser as
a bonus... The project title is "Add Elisp backend to Ragel" after
all.