From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iPd4OUwNxF5tPQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:46:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id aK08NUwNxF7uAQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:46:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659CC940143 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb5NT-0000gv-8t for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:46:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb5N2-0000gM-3n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:45:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]:42521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb5N1-0005UC-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:45:35 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id y18so163926pfl.9 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 09:45:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=1CJgRVm5RS1XCKOOgAgW5LN6OWHom5Jtk9ko4zE2i4Q=; b=U9VqvW/nfHMpejQs/0SWcmxaJJHbmorVnINEZKP41ha0DnI9S1Kw9h5PS3gtExDHbu Lv8zNn7gghfvqi31Jf0F1BU9pFtzoyaka9iFgRFROjWTpIABt0i+Xk66lEtXDADmKdtH qICoGP4BOpJjhcUgKDOCvkmecWC0rGVG710N/4Rw70HspdRsCwP15nv7DnmL29S7/+mU fLKj6n4BZfVdqhKW2J5/ft2ie+uJcM6tFexp4ZGwkKemrF1mrNW6fbTr9A2QrI+6dDTB slSNedPQMRgx+vg3XJMHtjR4gd9bPv9EPA4kOp9VL+Ttp+wkRnIsReHj6AvYg6tssFXe SxKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=1CJgRVm5RS1XCKOOgAgW5LN6OWHom5Jtk9ko4zE2i4Q=; b=fKv5gqBywudIMRSXCJH9bf70g2fPmKXyrq1/NKbu1qntbxIDD9He4iesCBhA/9mfNW cMyHFZFOBylInz8XHzyHd7QpRTDhLWiUHHdp/t7eHS1SLE5y+8mhLeIby9YNYgYUA/e4 uGa343wGq+IbMZzTw5lA0ci3bv51wN65LjutjZEWF7aF3K0teFRrYgJ+2ogZqEnaJcDv 3UeJT/RRrEBTbAu6FmWgXiS1bBTHK32gMigRlD6JJ624s76/DQ44zdN7+Wx/PZzIj9Uc JhqHcV/LLZLnd15Hpu0Ad0tQhoevcGfEVOrxMg8p4y9bA03HFzEe1uccNKne0i169Lef D5aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RnsJv5hroj17c3uJ6tEss6yIL7W/YZq88jnoZzjEXZpV4mlaj Gk219JxJB3F9lyxfDeWeK6NChIPtbWg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy96XMusrFl7XBTeIXO4SgXzNRJAaLPU6I84OxpEwaiCH6wc2lnWorbuFkFnusk5wkxdNKgaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d70f:: with SMTP id d15mr111592pgg.322.1589906733834; Tue, 19 May 2020 09:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tranquillity (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e13sm43659pfh.19.2020.05.19.09.45.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2020 09:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 00:45:28 +0800 From: Timothy To: Bruce D'Arcus Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: issue tracker? X-Mailer: Mailspring MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5ec40d28_748413ed_1b8a3" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::429; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x429.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_BL=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?tomas=40tuxteam.de?=" , org-mode-email Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=U9VqvW/n; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.50 X-TUID: qcQL3zW0ez2H --5ec40d28_748413ed_1b8a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline My 2c: Having a github-esque pubic issue tracker is good for accessibilit= y =E2=80=94 in the sense of ease of access to new-comers. Personally, this is the first time I've engaged in technical discussions = on a mailing list, and needing to use a ML did feel like an extra hurdle.= I wouldn't imagine that a Gogs issue tracker would prevent anyone from us= ing the mailing list, but might encourage more people to get involved. Is there any reason why we can't have both=3F Timothy. On May 19 2020, at 10:58 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Regardless, doing issue tracking, discussion, and patch submission on a= ML in 2020 is pretty odd and inefficient. > > I would have submitted feedback here 6-12 months earlier than I did if = org had a proper issue tracker. > On Tue, May 19, 2020, 3:35 AM wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:13:38PM -0500, James R Miller wrote: > > > Doesn=E2=80=99t Gogs have a nice issue tracker functionality=3F > > > > I looked up Gogs. Needs javascript *and* cookies. Wake me up when > > there's a plain, straight service which works without any of them. > > > > Cheers > > -- t > > --5ec40d28_748413ed_1b8a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
My 2c: Having a github-esque pubic issue tracker is good for accessi= bility =E2=80=94 in the sense of ease of access to new-comers.
= Personally, this is the first time I've engaged in technical discussions = on a mailing list, and needing to use a ML did feel like an extra hurdle.=

I wouldn't imagine that a Gogs issue tracker would pre= vent anyone from using the mailing list, but might encourage mo= re people to get involved.
Is there any reason why we can't hav= e both=3F

Timothy.

On May 19 2020, at 10:58 pm, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus=40g= mail.com> wrote:
Regardless, doing issue tr= acking, discussion, and patch submission on a ML in 2020 is pretty odd an= d inefficient. 

I would have submitted feed= back here 6-12 months earlier than I did if org had a proper issue tracke= r.

On Tue, May 19, 2020, 3:35 AM <tomas=40tuxteam.de<= /a>> wrote:

I looked up Gogs. N= eeds javascript *and* cookies. Wake me up when
there's a plain,= straight service which works without any of them.

Cheers
-- t
--5ec40d28_748413ed_1b8a3--