From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Begginer using orgmode Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:07:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <0F2397E5-B7B1-4BFB-A0D5-FBA091BB32EA@radford.edu> <20110416013231.13e3a0ef@bhishma.homelinux.net> <98E677DA-C9CB-4AED-9A86-5EE98C62721A@RADFORD.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEUs9-0000FU-6k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:07:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEUs8-0004c6-2y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:07:17 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:56675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEUs7-0004bz-RJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:07:16 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so112809bwz.0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:07:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <98E677DA-C9CB-4AED-9A86-5EE98C62721A@RADFORD.EDU> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Arnold, Travis" Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , "Urs Rau (UK)" Google it. Sifting through, however... - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1096009/carbon-vs-aqua-vs-cocoa-emacs-builds - http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsForMacOS I chose gnu emacs. No particular reason, but there was something psychological about using the same on Linux as well, so I went with it. I asked this question before and don't think I heard much say one way or the other. John On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Arnold, Travis wrote: > Is there a difference between the two? > Or personal prefrence? > -Travis > On 25 Apr, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Urs Rau (UK) wrote: > > http://aquamacs.org/ >