From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Shift-Arrow Pass Through for windmove? Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:11:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87633jb57w.wl%ded-law@ddoherty.net> <87ochaqhau.fsf@gmx.de> <5BE40E2F-2FB3-4010-9C68-8D66E351BED7@gmail.com> <87zl0tpxig.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O5Sy4-0004vB-5Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:11:32 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41633 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5Sy2-0004tq-Qf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:11:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5Sy0-0008JE-RJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:11:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:57135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5Sy0-0008J2-Mj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:11:28 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so3244631ewy.32 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:11:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zl0tpxig.fsf@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: "Daniel E. Doherty" , "emacs-orgmode@gnu org" On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >> >>> Daniel E. Doherty writes: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I make *very* frequent use of the shift-arrow keys to move from >>>> window >>>> to window inside emacs via windmove. It is probably the most >>>> frequent >>>> key combination I access. >>>> >>>> Anyway, is there a way to make org-mode friendlier to it by >>>> passing the >>>> key along whenever org-mode would otherwise throw an error. For >>>> example, when not on a heading, when in the agenda, and wherever >>>> else? >>>> >>>> I really like Carsten's use of the arrow keys for structure >>>> editing and >>>> don't want to lose that, just whenever org-mode can't make use of >>>> the >>>> keys. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> And here all the arrow keys. >>> >>> It's somewhat inelegant, since you always need to keep track of new >>> useful org-bindings. >>> >>> I would find an org-internal solution helpfull too. I use windmove. >> >> I have now added >> >> (defvar org-shiftup-hook nil >> "Hook for functions attaching themselves to `S-up'. >> See `org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook' for more information.") >> (defvar org-shiftdown-hook nil >> "Hook for functions attaching themselves to `S-down'. >> See `org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook' for more information.") >> (defvar org-shiftleft-hook nil >> "Hook for functions attaching themselves to `S-left'. >> See `org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook' for more information.") >> (defvar org-shiftright-hook nil >> "Hook for functions attaching themselves to `S-right'. >> See `org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook' for more information.") >> >> But I do not intend to attach specific functionality like windmove >> to them, >> and I'd like to reserve the possibility to make S-cursor do something >> in Org in more contexts. >> >> Hope this still helps. > > This could be perfect!!! > > But wouldn't the hook need to be called at the end of (e.g.) > `org-shiftright'? > > I want to use windmove as the last resort, as does the OP: > > > - (t (org-shiftselect-error)))) > + (t (if org-shiftright-hook > + ((run-hook-with-args-until-success 'org-shiftright-hook)) > + (org-shiftselect-error)))) > > ;; end of org-shiftright ($otpional arg) > > > > Otherwise we would loose the org-mode specific functions. > > We want to > > 1. try to do somehing org-specific (if org-headline-p ....) > 2. else run the hook (i.e. windmove in this case) > 3. error only if 1. and 2. failed > > > We do use windmove but at the same time we do _not_ want to loose all > those shift-right... features to come ;) Well, the idea is hat these hooks *can* overrule what org-mode wants to do, so whatever you put into the hook needs to decide if it wants to apply. We could add *another* hook at the end... - Carsten > > > > Sebastian - Carsten