From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:47:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> <4BB3973D.3090305@comcast.net> <9667B267-935B-4DFB-800B-FC76DBCCBF28@gmail.com> <8739z8g3ul.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <871ves8t5f.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <2D73D1C7-5BEF-46D2-9A56-4F4321005550@gmail.com> <87wrwk7cf7.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <6DA7F0F0-D60E-4214-889A-C5A135970E7B@tsdye.com> <6500482A-2E3D-4311-889B-77E33F82E72A@gmail.com> <87sk778yen.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzQuy-00017p-1U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:47:24 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36359 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzQuw-00016r-DA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:47:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzQuu-0004Ys-Oz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:47:22 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.147]:54307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzQuu-0004Ym-JR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:47:20 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so82657eyg.34 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:47:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sk778yen.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Karsten Heymann Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Robert Klein On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Karsten Heymann wrote: > > Carsten Dominik writes: >> On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >>> From the microtype documentation: >>> >>>> The microtype package does not work with XETEX. >> >> Does that mean it will break running XETEX, or will i just be >> ignored? > > It only gives a (harmless) warning: > > Package microtype Warning: You don't seem to be using pdftex. > (microtype) All micro-typographic features will be > disabled. > > But chances are high that most "normal" LaTeX documents will not work > with xelatex anyways due to encoding or font selection issues, so I > think unless org-mode aims at explicitely supporting XeTeX out of the > box this whole topic can (and should) be ignored. > > Btw. current microtype does not support current luatex as well AFAIK, > but that can be ignored too. So to summarize: - I should include the microtype package - People using XeTeX need to tweak their setup anyway and can be expected to know about all issues related to it. Thanks! - Carsten