From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-capture and blank lines
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:56:37 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikYUUxx-6Nd2Kvg2wCdM+uPFtMezUv8EUX43_=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3_0JW3XOJabw2mUWsUJmOBX_0FQ1apzkY22PK@mail.gmail.com>
	<8DEE7E6B-DD11-41A0-9FE5-2CFD73EB33E3@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34067 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrQCV-0000bf-Qk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:56:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1OrQCU-0006YD-Kk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:56:39 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63806)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1OrQCU-0006Y3-F6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:56:38 -0400
Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so1510863wyb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8DEE7E6B-DD11-41A0-9FE5-2CFD73EB33E3@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi C,

Thanks for your reply.

On 2010-09-02, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then, at kill time, when I am cleaning up, it is hard to tell if there
> was an empty line originally....

In my case, there is never one, FWIW.  I.e. the following never
happens deliberately.

  * target

  ** new entry

Nor this.

  * target
  text

  ** new entry

So in principle it's OK to clean it up for users like me, in case you
decide to make that optional.  I'd enable that.

In any case, again, capture is superb.  Safe and fast.

S