From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Sauer Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:22:47 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0900709052==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36690 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PthWM-0005iv-37 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:22:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PthWK-0003yJ-PH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:22:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:52899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PthWK-0003yD-HA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:22:48 -0500 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so1075997eyh.0 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============0900709052== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c38c41eed02049d444c04 --0015174c38c41eed02049d444c04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Even though I am not much into development I enjoy reading them as they are teaching me about how this works and hopefully I can move to doing DEV further down the road. Even if we had two lists I would just add a filter tag like I do now and sort them all into the same tag (well, maybe, maybe not). Maybe the DEV channel should be something that you are invited to join with send access but anyone could have read access too. If a question in the user channel fit the bill it could be resent or re-proposed into the DEV channel? Maybe that's too constricted for open development? I agree, two channels so you can get what you want but they need to have reference to each other and at least a few people on both. On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Julien, > > Julien Danjou writes: > > > How about splitting the mailing list in a user and a development list? > > I am in favor of using a [DEV] tag and stick to one single list. > > The path from users to developers (and to core Org developers) is > a continuum, keeping this continuum on one list is a good thing. > > What other people think? > > -- > Bastien > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > --0015174c38c41eed02049d444c04 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Even though I am not much into development I enjoy reading them as they are= teaching me about how this works and hopefully I can move to doing DEV fur= ther down the road.

Even if we had two lists I would jus= t add a filter tag like I do now and sort them all into the same tag (well,= maybe, maybe not). =A0 Maybe the DEV=A0channel=A0should be something that = you are invited to join with send access but anyone could have read access = too. =A0If a question in the user channel fit the bill it could be resent o= r re-proposed into the DEV channel? =A0Maybe that's too constricted for= open development? =A0=A0

--0015174c38c41eed02049d444c04-- --===============0900709052== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0900709052==--