From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Horn Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:06:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87oc7cagmm.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45298 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PffKm-0000w0-N1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:12:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PffKl-0001Lp-4a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:12:52 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:44772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PffKk-0001LG-Um for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:12:51 -0500 Received: by mail-fx0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 12so1308741fxm.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:12:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oc7cagmm.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Jason Dunsmore wrote: > Jeff Horn writes: > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore >> wrote: >>> I think this might be unnecessary (hitting "Back", typing the "Home" >>> key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do >>> this). >> >> I'm not an expert, but that is not very "accessible". Shouldn't be a >> problem with modern text browsers, but I remember this being an >> accessibility recommendation for FAQish pages at my previous >> university. > > Hm, that sounds a bit like folklore. =A0Is there some accessibility > standard we can follow, and should we (how up-to-date are these > documents relative to modern "accessible" browsers)? =A0I noticed every > other project FAQ I came across doesn't do this: > > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/FAQ > https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq > http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_:_FAQs I'll happily concede the point. And, the linked FAQs are easily navigable in W3M. Honestly, it was a reflex. I learned all sorts of "rules of thumb" working with the media department as a student at NCSU. --=20 Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/