Re: [BUG] org-latex-packages-alist type specification [9.6.3 (release_9.6.3-2-gf2949d @ /usr/local/share/emacs/29.0.90/lisp/org/)]

[Ruijie Yu via "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>]

> On Apr 13, 2023, at 19:23, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
> 
> Ruijie Yu via "General discussions about Org-mode."
> <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> From 0be8702357ddf699c5ff1814a5fa57a6443b10de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ruijie Yu <ruijie@netyu.xyz>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:14:36 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/org.el org-latex-packages-alist: fixed type definition
> 
> Thanks!
> May I know if you got any reply about your FSF assignment?

Yes, it is now complete.  I presume you want to check with Bastien, so I took the liberty of CC’ing him myself. 

>> ---
>> lisp/org.el | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
>> index 26d2a8610..5bad16fd9 100644
>> --- a/lisp/org.el
>> +++ b/lisp/org.el
>> @@ -3490,7 +3490,8 @@ Make sure that you only list packages here which:
>>      (list :tag "options/package pair"
>>        (string :tag "options")
>>        (string :tag "package")
>> -         (boolean :tag "Snippet"))
>> +         (boolean :tag "snippet")
>> +                 (repeat :tag "compilers" string))
> 
> Compiler list may also be nil.

This should be covered by the repeat case?  Unless you want to be explicit about this, in which case you can wrap it in a choice, whose first choice being (const :tag “description” nil), and the second choice being the repeat case.  Can’t change the patch myself because I don’t have access to a computer ATM. 

> -- 
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode contributor,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

--
Best,


RY