From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: iPhone ----> org-mode Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:25:28 +0100 Message-ID: <90B9A36E-02DE-483A-88A2-43CC12D45EFE@uva.nl> References: <15979874-86B6-4E93-9EDD-CE1A30E6525A@uva.nl> <49C100EC-8DBC-47B3-AD9A-B39DD3B2A11B@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LmPMh-0007Ka-KO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:25:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LmPMc-0007K3-Fk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:25:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45984 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LmPMc-0007Jz-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:25:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:39157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LmPMb-00039I-RT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:25:34 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2881661ewy.42 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:25:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49C100EC-8DBC-47B3-AD9A-B39DD3B2A11B@uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Brad Bozarth wrote: > >> A quick question - if I use a non-nil org-feed-assume-stable, will >> that handle "updating" a changed reqall entry? This would be both for >> the case of the entries initially saying "Reqall is typing what you >> said" before they are transcribed, and for the case of editing an >> existing entry on the iPhone or web interface. > > No, things like this is handled yet. I am really becoming incapable to write properly. Sorry about that. What I meant is this: No, things like this are not handled. I view this as a one-way interface, capture to Org. Maybe it would be good to catch things like "reqall is typing" to make sure this entry will be ignored now and picked up again later... With the current implementation, the entry will be captured in whatever state it is, and then not look at it again. - Carsten