From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: todo items not working? Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:46:26 -0400 Message-ID: <8978.1241117186@alphaville.usa.hp.com> References: <192422.16395.qm@web28313.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <65339c410904291925k7681a714s9f05c3d721d7d911@mail.gmail.com> <10225.1241065900@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <65339c410904292145p6f8be559j5d1d376dd83c86cb@mail.gmail.com> <65339c410904301054i1f4bf352sce2d25fd955965d4@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LzbIT-0008T4-Us for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LzbIO-0008Rz-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38382 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LzbIO-0008Rv-AK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:44 -0400 Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:4928) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LzbIN-0002nC-W3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Saketh of "Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:54:33 EDT." <65339c410904301054i1f4bf352sce2d25fd955965d4@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Saketh Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Saketh wrote: > > I did the 'edebug-defun' as Nick suggested and found the problem. An obscure library that was > installed on both of my machines modified outline-regexp before org was loaded (as Nick had > guessed), causing the wacky behavior. > Was the library a public one? If so, you probably should post its name so that there is a record of it in the archives - the next victim might then have an easier time identifying the problem than you did!-) Nick