From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: [babel] error when loading library-of-babel after update this morning Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:58:21 -0600 Message-ID: <87zki4pjp4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4E730EBF.20700@gmail.com> <80zki4alb1.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4amW-0001z9-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:56:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4amV-000155-Dt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:56:48 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:64023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4amV-00014v-6U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:56:47 -0400 Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so3441604iae.0 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:56:45 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Rainer, > > Rainer M Krug wrote: >> when evaluating >> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> (org-babel-lob-ingest >> "~/.emacs.d/org-mode/contrib/babel/library-of-babel.org") >> #+end_src >> >> I get the following error: >> >> executing Emacs-Lisp code block... >> variable "nil" must be assigned a default value >> >> this occurred after the update this morning to >> >> Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.291.g37db) > > I confirm that, with the exact same message, for my own local LOB, since this > morning's update. > > And I don't have a `nil' variable either in the (only) code block... > Hi, I introduced this bug yesterday when I made the change which checks that all functional-syntax variables are assigned values. While checking the new code deletes the variables value! I've just pushed up a fix. Cheers -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/