From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: *Natural* language highlighting
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:26:54 +0200
Message-ID: <87zk9wdfxd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4F99F684.8090306@imap.cc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38327)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SNsfq-0003Ra-9v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:25:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SNsfo-00022U-Jk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:25:53 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:60080)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SNsfo-00020W-AU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:25:52 -0400
Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so918288wer.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F99F684.8090306@imap.cc> (Alex Lane's message of "Thu, 26 Apr
	2012 19:29:40 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alex Lane <alexpgp@imap.cc>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Alex Lane <alexpgp@imap.cc> writes:

> On a (somewhat) related note, might someone point me at the face
> description(s) used for orgmode definition lists (e.g., foo :: bar)? I
> would specifically like to make the 'foo' part of such a definition a
> bit more assertive.

>From latest git, there is now `org-list-dt' for the definition terms 
in those lists.  Thanks for the suggestion and thanks to Nick for the
guidance!

-- 
 Bastien