From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: new exporter Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:12:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87zk7lxogy.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <3C38420E-E2FA-4CAB-B3FD-9C5F8584E60A@gmail.com> <81fwadrgoo.fsf@gmail.com> <87396dzlai.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <871ulqgb4t.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5nyx4ku.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9zq7htj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4t261fw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3yu15wj.fsf@gmail.com> <87395hkj7u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9gwmet.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87pq8j2a0y.fsf@gmail.com> <87r4sy3rve.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9d1eif.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkrrQ-0001pS-Gb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:12:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkrrO-0000XZ-DS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:12:52 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkrrO-0000XP-6I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:12:50 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkrrK-0000As-9U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:12:46 +0200 Received: from pd9eb57a5.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.87.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:12:46 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb57a5.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:12:46 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Ok, I misunderstood your answer: I thought you had solved the problem. I thought that too at first, but it didn't survive closer scrutiny... >> I'm not sure what you intended the macroexpansion to be at the place >> of use, hence my suggestion to check these macros again. > > I will look more carefully at the `org-export-with-current-buffer-copy' > macro, but, since I cannot reproduce the compilation error it may be > hard to find the mistake. I gave a very detailed example of how to arrive at the error. Additionally, even if I change the order of compilation so that I don't get the error during compilation itself, the result doesn't survive the test suite since the compiled bytecode is actually wrong. I've tested this with several Emacs versions. So when you say you can't reproduce it you must be doing something quite different, would you care to explain what that is? Compiling from the edit buffer doesn't count since it is non-reproduceable by default (although if you knew what packages you've loaded it may give a hint on what is amiss). Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables