From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:02:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87zj8oqqtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu> <87k2zsso3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbjcoewx.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnl4shqg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9uwwmgt.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVEg-0000JM-4A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:01:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVEc-0005CH-Vo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:01:30 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:56612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVEc-0005C3-QV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:01:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h9uwwmgt.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:40:18 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > PS: Here's a quick link "proof-of-concept" (not really) with biblatex > only, and cite it textcitation. Documents with this type of syntax are > indeed pleasant to the eye. > > [[cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2]] As pointed out already, the double square bracket is not needed, and can introduce ambiguity with links. I'm fine with [cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2] but how do you distinguish between in-text and in-parenthesis? Also, how do you extract year or journal from the key (since you suggested these features in the first place)? Regards,