From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: Errors get suppressed by org-babel-execute-src-block Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:31:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87ziv5kf80.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pow4pb5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87bn7nrx7v.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUHZ7-0005uU-NM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:31:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUHZ4-00065g-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:31:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]:34705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUHZ4-00065Q-8E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:31:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 128so71411511wmz.1 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:31:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bn7nrx7v.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nick, 2016ko otsailak 11an, Nick Dokos-ek idatzi zuen: >=20 > Not sure if there are tests for remote babel execution,=20 AFAIK no. It would be useful to have these. All the machines I use run Linux and are configured very similarly. Many of the problems in remote execution come from differences in environments. So it would be good if someone could figure out how to test common configurations. Until that happens, we have to rely on ad hoc testing or user reports. > but if not, please make sure to test that (with :dir set to some > directory on a different machine). Michael Albinus had done some work > to get that working a few years ago: AFAICS my patch does not affect the work Michael did. I will test some simple remote execution scenarios before I push the patch, just in case. > BTW, I tried to test, but applying the patch to current master > (8eff64cffee8627578edc33de485201ae579fafe) fails: Nicolas pushed some big changes to babel just after I sent my patch. (Big in terms of the diff to the code, not necessarily in terms of changing user behavior). I haven=E2=80=99t looked in detail, but it=E2=80= =99s almost guaranteed that the patch now needs to be rebased, which I=E2=80=99ll do as soon as I can. --=20 Aaron Ecay