From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KDzlKfBPdV//BQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:41:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id CAm6JfBPdV/tDwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:41:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328DE940430 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpTJ-0005wi-1V for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:41:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpSJ-0005uh-Vn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:40:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]:33878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpSI-0001U6-4o; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:40:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id u24so2920205pgi.1; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=KoztC5Bs+lgZAJGfZqZikAg2m/RUmrZ4R6sLcncAkR0=; b=ZJluI9BXal48BrL3OdQbPZ4R+qK2EnVXA8RSbfq0iXd13xm9x7ysBfN4ZZKF/LVmiw YACRQEQrElvYdpPwOkyMDFFNpS2aIG/5WAlrwU7W7yG6KkKGp5ix3tkxXOwtUJ+D8uA0 x/YobFaQFuphB+Iynvgfed0yWQifPdaW5ZkdCckaD7e+bEtS/RJNpWzmTZkOzA/wehv4 WpImWVIdc+xO7avlGCvQMhWr05VKdq0xzMBnmrEnWth1dFu5zHXipuLkKkZQxyxm+S5u pTlQkoZt684UPTqh6tuQCxZolZ69FjWbMJFb34sP8Y0Sg6wP/Lta/lDDXAaXZUfP3LlH DPtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=KoztC5Bs+lgZAJGfZqZikAg2m/RUmrZ4R6sLcncAkR0=; b=bjoNwNdAFB6p9UnIrhBqbyq2h5D7B9jqIUkvMkoGEgJcj2zLJ6pvBitSluk4PR9X5d bycCogocKbXGBKeuV+39tLLODaj0nj09iFbLPm/Hyi79gGMrWK6j2dOJp6F4My3KC88A PgUdn3qJppjVpcItKW3AvTZoN4DMYg5KUw3EUo+GKQl/rbQwFqwQUzAfqEuj5gYeKCK5 NLsxAcyud5dnefR9YShna89OySoe2q6D5jMBXMGwMOiJhC2OVryKaKI3CguvYlO4t8Ve 9AqSDcZ8yaJEfqfBZKUzewrAIXCyj1ydthSbGD18qbU5c1koZ5+djetTouCruXuNRTvJ KAPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531aqDxyygIgTW+IKiP7nxnQG0bJ+yUN7WWV1iSouRRddzzE2M4I wJlPSt/UICWkDkUD2qu9NHYttTXIAXb97w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxslPB7GcwsSGKCPUipPgSkAChIL4S6EbKGcYQkYhvYFuDGtunKqA4rplCHZBPbGj7GZ8d+eg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:50e:: with SMTP id 14mr4457351pgf.443.1601523627820; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v204sm4100646pfc.10.2020.09.30.20.40.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:40:27 -0700 (PDT) References: <871rjhha8t.fsf@gmail.com> <5f5325db.1c69fb81.53d7d.5b93@mx.google.com> <87pn70ai0t.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2log45r.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgbgg9r0.fsf@gmail.com> <09b16f10-06ea-d28c-79a9-424c6940fe56@XXXXXXXXX.XXX> <87r1qt9cf0.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: TEC To: Bastien Subject: Re: Shower thought: submit an IETF RFC to register Org as a MIME type In-reply-to: <87r1qt9cf0.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87zh56fwbc.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:40:23 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::542; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x542.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: hj-orgmode-1@hj.proberto.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZJluI9BX; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: WT6f2q/rN7WR Bastien writes: > If there is absolutely zero burden put on the shoulders of Org's > maintainers, then I'm all for it. >From the look of things, there's just effort in the initial creation. >> I think it would serve well the proliferation and >> popularization of org-mode. > > Agreed. This is the main reason why I'm a fan of the idea :) > Is anyone willing to check that there are no constraints? I've read through https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838 and I couldn't see any constraints placed on us beyond the initial registration's requirements. For that, I think a formal syntax specification would be needed. Perhaps https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html will do? It looks complete. I'm hoping we could then use https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7763 (registration of text/markdown) as a template, where we could just link to the syntax specification. Perhaps it could be worth putting the syntax spec under the main site as something like orgmode.org/syntax-spec.html. I've also been considering spinning off the manual into a bit of a specification document (e.g. less of a guide / how-to, stripped down to just the bare information), so perhaps orgmode.org/specification.html#syntax ? I'd really like some second opinions. > Is anyone willing to move forward with this registration? In about two months, I am. It looks like creating and draft and then emailing it to media-types@iana.org would probably be the best approach. All the best, Timothy.