From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:27:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87y59vr5ln.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <444ea6cff489e2adc97092bdac881aef@mail.rickster.com> <878v1y574d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874ncm55ma.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4fq3ptf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip11h2zq.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvw5fkpt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3lgewrv.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo6sqhir.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87d2r8hy38.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49519) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsDBA-0001EC-Nf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:28:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsDB9-00067r-Dp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:28:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsDB9-00067i-88 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:28:07 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsDB5-0000vy-Q3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:28:03 +0200 Received: from pd9eb4faf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.79.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:28:03 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb4faf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:28:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andreas Leha writes: > I did not follow this tread, so I just wanted to clarify: You are talking > about making me to replace > > #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset1") :results table > #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset2") :results table > > with > > #+name: call_number_of_sth_with_origin_dataset1 > #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset1") :results table > #+name: call_number_of_sth_with_origin_dataset2 > #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset2") :results table No. What I'm talking about is that this behaviour is sensible only for #+CALL lines that have functional semantics (i.e. always produce the same result as long as the arguments stay the same) and therefore shouldn't be the (unconditional) default. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds