From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:52:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87y51y6gk8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ob33nnwi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh3yvgyg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <3bc3c5a1-1c3f-4975-9dd6-3428aabb69be@default> <87ppniu06o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1c11f795-ca4a-45bf-9701-7645a0609ed1@default> <87lhy6l4k4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2jh93jb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bnywtqx4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <52E8E982.6070701@miszellen.de> <87k3dj6i88.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8VZW-00026b-0B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:53:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8VZN-0005Iv-Fi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:52:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]:34425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8VZN-0005Ib-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:52:45 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so921266eek.13 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:52:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k3dj6i88.fsf@gmail.com> (Nick Dokos's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:16:39 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nick Dokos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The > argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance > of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking > in the rear-view mirror for some minor mode that will step on us. In the last ten years, we had only *one* such problem while having a dozen of faulty keybindings --- my hope is that, with only a fistful of faulty keybindings, we won't have to look in the rear-view mirror for the next twenty years :) [IOW: I don't buy the all-or-nothing reasoning.] More precisely, I suggest these rebindings: C-c # Checkboxes => C-c C-# C-c , Priorities => C-c C-, C-c ; Comment lines => C-c C-; C-c @ Mark subtree => C-c C-@ (Note they are also accessible through speedy keys.) C-c ~ Cooperation => C-c C-~ (This one I just discovered.) Let's not get trapped in a "buridanesque" decision. :) -- Bastien