From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarmo Hurri Subject: Babel: RESULTS for no value Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:40:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4n9yr0a.fsf@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUD6W-0000DX-3g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:41:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUD6S-0001Zo-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:41:12 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUD6S-0001Za-MG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:41:08 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YUD6R-00032U-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:41:07 +0100 Received: from 62-78-164-169.bb.dnainternet.fi ([62.78.164.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:41:07 +0100 Received: from jarmo.hurri by 62-78-164-169.bb.dnainternet.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:41:07 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Greetings. Would it be feasible to change Babel so that it would *not* output #+RESULTS: into the org buffer in case there is absolutely no value for a block? Consider the following example, which draws an Asymptote picture in an external viewer. # ------------------------------------------------------------------ #+BEGIN_SRC asymptote size (5cm); filldraw (unitcircle, red); #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: # ------------------------------------------------------------------ The #+RESULTS: line is produced even though there is no output from the block. Making this change would make my life a bit simpler in finalising Processing support for Babel. Jarmo