From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Compilation problem
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:09:29 +0530
Message-ID: <87wr01sdsu.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2pq5u2h8h.fsf@top.irisa.fr>
	<5986.1347306768@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<87wr01hc4f.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87lighr5xf.fsf@altern.org>
	<87pq5thbno.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87har5r5iv.fsf@altern.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58032)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1TBCcp-0007F2-N3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1TBCcl-0000YG-3F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:58271)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1TBCck-0000Y6-TC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:35 -0400
Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so3380188pbb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87har5r5iv.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 10 Sep
	2012 22:23:36 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Cc: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>, Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:
>>>> That would be commit 830a0781a6 by Jambunathan, then.  Autoloads really
>>>> don't work that way, so could this please be reverted?
>>>
>>> Done.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> By way of explanation: autoload knows about a handful of "special"
>> constructs.  If you put an autoload cookie on any other sexp, it will be
>> copied verbatim into the autoload file.  This comes in handy sometimes,
>> but the sexp may not make any sense in that context=E2=80=A6
>
> Yes.  On top of that, I think these functions do not need to be
> autoloaded anyway.=20=20

Please ask for clarification and politely indicate that a change may
have to be reverted.  It will be promptly followed up.  Please don't
reach a conclusion.

Let me see!=20=20

Can someone explain to me the reason why I might have added those in
first place?  Instead of the commit being wrong, is it possible that
changes were incomplete.  Do you have a solution for what that autoload
was trying to solve.

I am OK with the revert, btw.

There is a popular saying in Tamil which goes like "One who has sown the
seeds, will water the plants."  I have been watering the plants, you
know, whether I like it or not.

ps: I am not interested in a discussion.=20=20
--=20