From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Compilation problem Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:09:29 +0530 Message-ID: <87wr01sdsu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <5986.1347306768@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87wr01hc4f.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87lighr5xf.fsf@altern.org> <87pq5thbno.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87har5r5iv.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBCcp-0007F2-N3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBCcl-0000YG-3F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:58271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBCck-0000Y6-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:38:35 -0400 Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so3380188pbb.0 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87har5r5iv.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:23:36 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Bastien , Achim Gratz Bastien writes: > Achim Gratz writes: > >> Bastien writes: >>> Achim Gratz writes: >>>> That would be commit 830a0781a6 by Jambunathan, then. Autoloads really >>>> don't work that way, so could this please be reverted? >>> >>> Done. >> >> Thank you. >> >> By way of explanation: autoload knows about a handful of "special" >> constructs. If you put an autoload cookie on any other sexp, it will be >> copied verbatim into the autoload file. This comes in handy sometimes, >> but the sexp may not make any sense in that context=E2=80=A6 > > Yes. On top of that, I think these functions do not need to be > autoloaded anyway.=20=20 Please ask for clarification and politely indicate that a change may have to be reverted. It will be promptly followed up. Please don't reach a conclusion. Let me see!=20=20 Can someone explain to me the reason why I might have added those in first place? Instead of the commit being wrong, is it possible that changes were incomplete. Do you have a solution for what that autoload was trying to solve. I am OK with the revert, btw. There is a popular saying in Tamil which goes like "One who has sown the seeds, will water the plants." I have been watering the plants, you know, whether I like it or not. ps: I am not interested in a discussion.=20=20 --=20